1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lukranit [14]
2 years ago
11

Why did the United States not complain about the construction of the Berlin Wall in 1961?

History
2 answers:
sweet-ann [11.9K]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The correct answer is B. The United States did not complain about the construction of the Berlin Wall in 1961 because it protected West Berlin from any attempts of the Soviet Union to conquer it.

Explanation:

The American reaction to the construction of the wall was slow: 20 hours passed until the appearance of the military forces on the border; 40 hours until they communicated with the Soviet commander of Berlin; and 72 hours until they protested at Moscow's diplomacy. There were more and more rumors that the Soviets had assured the Western allies that they would not threaten their rights. The experience of the blockade had shown the allies that West Berlin was threatened, so the construction of the wall was a material confirmation of the status quo, that is, the recognition of Western domination of that part of the city. The Soviet Union abandoned its request that West Berlin be "free" of allied troops, which it had formulated in the Khrushchev ultimatum of 1958. In this way, the United States ensured that the Soviet Union would not attack West Berlin.

Margaret [11]2 years ago
3 0
<span>b. The wall protected West Berlin from any attempts of the Soviet Union to conquer it.
</span>
You might be interested in
Which important document was signed by King John in the 1200s granting certain rights to the English people and limiting the kin
WITCHER [35]
It would be "d. the Magna Carta" that was <span>signed by King John in the 1200s granting certain rights to the English people and limiting the king’s power, since Parliament practically forced him to do so. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
How did the proclamation of 1763 lead to the american revolution?
GrogVix [38]

On October 7, 1763, King George III issued a proclamation that forbade colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains. In so doing, he hoped to placate Native Americans who had sided against him during the recently concluded Seven Years’ War. Enforcement was so weak, however, that it did very little to curb the westward flow of pioneers. Even prominent figures such as George Washington paid it no heed, except as a source of anti-British sentiment leading up to the American Revolution.

Great Britain’s victory over France in the Seven Years’ War, also known as the French and Indian War, gave it control over all of eastern North America. Most native tribes had allied with the French during the conflict, and they soon found themselves dissatisfied by British rule. In May 1763, just a few months after the formal conclusion of the Seven Years’ War, a pan-tribal confederacy led by Ottawa chief Pontiac rose up in rebellion. His warriors attacked a dozen British forts, capturing eight of them, and raided numerous frontier settlements. Hundreds died in the process. In response, the British handed out smallpox-infected blankets to Pontiac’s followers. Moreover, a gang of whites known as the Paxton Boys massacred 20 defenseless Native Americans who had nothing to do with the fighting.

In an attempt to prevent similar incidents from occurring, King George III issued a royal proclamation on October 7, 1763, which established three new mainland colonies (Quebec, West Florida and East Florida), extended Georgia’s southern border and gave land to soldiers who had fought in the Seven Years’ War. More notably, it banned colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains, at least “for the present, and until our further pleasure be known.” Those colonists already there were ordered to relocate. Acknowledging that “great frauds and abuses have been committed,” the proclamation furthermore prohibited individuals from buying tribal territory. Instead, only the crown could now make such purchases. “We shall avoid many future quarrels with the savages by this salutary measure,” said General Thomas Gage, who commanded all British forces in North America.

The British made a perfunctory effort to enforce the proclamation, periodically stopping settlers as they headed west and forcibly removing others. On one occasion, redcoats from Fort Pitt in present-day Pittsburgh even burned the huts of some nearby pioneers and escorted them back across the boundary. For the most part, though, colonists disregarded the proclamation without fear of punishment. Some wanted only enough land for themselves and their families, whereas others were speculators looking to make a hefty profit down the road. George Washington, for one, wrote to his agent in 1767 in support of illegally buying as much Native American land as possible. The Proclamation of 1763 will soon be revoked, Washington explained, because—“this I say between ourselves”—it was only meant “as a temporary expedient to quiet the minds of the Indians.” Other famous speculators included Patrick Henry, best known for his “Give me liberty or give me death” speech, and Henry Laurens, who later served as president of the Continental Congress.

Washington’s prediction proved prescient the following year, when the British 

5 0
3 years ago
What was the economic philosophy of the republican presidents of the 1920s?
barxatty [35]
Qeqeqeqeqeqeqqeqeqeqeqeqeqeqeqeqeeqeqeqeqeqeqeqeqeqeq
8 0
3 years ago
Environmental challenges who was the first group of people to settle in the area of the fertile crescent
kkurt [141]
<span>The Fertile Crescent includes Mesopotamia, the land in and around the Tigris and Euphrates rivers; and the Levant, the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea.</span>
8 0
2 years ago
How does history affect current pieces of writing? Or does it only affect literature from the same period?
lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

History plays a fundamental role in shaping literature: every novel, play or poem one reads is influenced by the political context in which it is written, the people that the author knows and the wider society that frames the entire work.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The period of mutal distrust and tension between the United States and the Soviet Union following World War ll is called____.
    13·1 answer
  • How did the religious beliefs of Moctezuma I lead to the expansion of the Aztec empire?
    10·2 answers
  • Under what circumstances is a warrant not needed?
    7·1 answer
  • How did president andrew jackson policies affect american indians
    9·1 answer
  • Who is all the presidentsof usa
    8·1 answer
  • How did the "Doctrine of Discovery" impact indigenous peoples?
    8·1 answer
  • What led to the french and indian war? what was the outcome?​
    5·1 answer
  • Which country did not belong to the central powers?
    13·2 answers
  • How did the industrial revolution impact America politically
    7·1 answer
  • 3. Are "the Mrs. of Nassau County" for or against the passage of the Child Labor
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!