No, I truly believe he would NOT have a different fate.
Generally speaking, Hamilton took a far more interpretational view of the Constitution than Jefferson, who was more of a constructionist in the sense that he wanted the federal government to be relatively limited in power.
Answer:Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
Explanation:
<span>Judah
Hope that helps ya!</span>