write a paragraph arguing whether the United States would benefit today from the policies proposed by the Federalists.

History

1 answer:

amid [387]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

How would the United States be different today if the proposals outlined in The Anti- Federalist had been accepted? If the proposals outlined in The Anti-Federalist had been accepted, our system would function more like that of Great Britain. The Congress would have even greater authority than it does todayThe Federalists countered that a strong government was necessary to lead the new nation and promised to add a bill of rights to the Constitution. The Federalist Papers, in particular, argued in favor of ratification and sought to convince people that the new government would not become tyrannical.

Madison argued strongly for a strong central government that would unify the country. The Convention delegates met secretly through the summer and finally signed the proposed U.S. Constitution on September

pls mark me as BRAINLIEST

You might be interested in

Who was the last president of Haiti

goldenfox [79]

Michel martelly was the last president of haiti

5 0

3 years ago

Why was winston churchill reluctant to open a western front against germany?

Tems11 [23]

Winston Churchill reluctant to open a western front against Germany because he remembered the slaughter on the Western Front in World War I.

Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Different powers are used throughout the levels of government. Review and match the types of powers to their definition. Questio

kirill115 [55]

Let's match each type of power with its definition

concurrent powers: powers that both national and state governments have/do such as collecting taxes . They refer to those powers which are shared by the different goverment levels existing in the federal structure: at the federal, state, province and local levels.
delegated powers: Powers specifically given to the national government such as establishing post offices. These are also known as enumerated powers and are contained in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States.
denied powers: powers neither the federal or state government have (such as making a law that would prevent the establishment of religion). These are powers which cannot be exercised by any level within a federal goverment, for example, allowing slavery (explicitly forbidden by 13th Amendment) denying voting rights to certain citizens (explicitly condemned in the Voting Rights Act from 1965).
implied powers: powers that are suggested and allowed due to the necessary and proper/elastic clause such as establishing the interstate highway system. These powers are not explicitly included in the US Constitution but can be derived from others than are.
inherent powers: powers that don't have to be given in the Constitution - they are just a part of government, such as protecting the country from attack. These are goverment powers which are not explicitly stated in a Constitution but are implicit in a sovereign state and for its rulers.

5 0

3 years ago

Who among the following was NOT a muckraker? Ida Tarbell, Upton Sinclair, Juliette Gordon, Lincoln Steffens.

kondor19780726 [428]

Tarbell is your answer hope this helps

5 0

3 years ago

A factor hindering the German invasion of Russia was

belka [17]

A factor hindering the German invasion of Russia was Russia's incredibly large territory and brutally cold winters, since this made it nearly impossible for the Germans to maintain forces inland.

7 0

3 years ago