Answer:
-1.2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Cuando rechazamos la hipótesis nula, esperaríamos que la razón de varianza, a largo plazo, sea: <u>mayor al valor crítico.</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Rayshawn originally had $30.
Step-by-step explanation:
i) Rayshawn has a certain amount of money. Let us say this amount is $x.
ii) Rayshawn spends $20 which means that he is left with $(x - 20)
iii) it is also given that amount of money left after spending $20 is
of the original amount, $x, the amount remaining is
.
iv) from the information given in ii) and iii) we get
$(x - 20) =
, Therefore we get 3x - 60 = x , therefore 2x = 60,
Therefore x = $30. Rayshawn originally had $30.
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
Labor productivity is is measured per hours.
Hence, the work he does [amount of claims] will be distributed amongst the amount of hours he works. The amount of dollar he uses <em>doesn't matter for labor productivity.</em>
<em />
Thus, his work is 6 claims. He does that is 8 hours. So claim/hr is:
6/8 = 0.75 claims per hour
Answer choice D is right.