Yes, it seems to be an alternative, in some situations acceptable, but eccentric and not neutral spelling of this word. It accents the fact that "ea" here are two separate vowels rather than a diphthong: that is the function of the trema (the two dots).
In practice it's not used much, because it's not really necessary: it does not distinguish it from any other word, and trema is not easy to find on English keyboards: so there is no need.
Answer:
Eye contact, addressing the whole room, KNOW YOUR STUFF, and practice.
Explanation:
Answer:
There are two ways which we can use to change the sentence from affirmative to negative:
1. Not only the industrious prosper in life.
2. Only the industrious do not prosper in life.
Explanation:
1. If we choose to make the negative this way, the meaning we will convey is that industrious people prosper, but they are not the only ones. Other people can prosper too.
2. On the other hand, if we negate this way, we will completely deny the original affirmation. We will be saying that everyone else prospers in life excerpt for industrious people.
Both ways are grammatically correct, even though they convey different meanings.
The answer is a since it could have a different meani
Answer: A. Location and Scenery