what did the Missouri Compromise suggest about the limits of nationalism in he United states in he 1820's

1 answer:

3 0

<span>It showed that differences such as North and South and Slavery and no slavery still existed in America and divided the states still. i am 100% sure of my answer and plz my answer brainliest</span>

You might be interested in

!!100 Points!! Will give brainliest to best answerer (dont report)

Paraphin [41]

Answer:

In the 16th century, the Catholic Church had a practice of selling indulgences. An indulgence was a payment to the church that paid for you to be exempted from certain sins. Sometimes they could pay for a loved one to spend less time in purgatory. Luthers thesis 82 was aimed at the Pope, asking why the Pope doesnt deliver ALL souls at the same time out of purgatory to relieve their misery. Is he only saving a few souls at a time so that he can get more money for the Catholic Church, thus exposing evil practices of the Catholic Church at that time.

Explanation:

brainly

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What happened in the fourth Crusade?

DaniilM [7]

The army sacked Constantinople.

6 0

3 years ago

Which statements accurately describe Roger Williams?

Kay [80]

Answer:

A & B.

Explanation:

The best answer in terms of Roger Williams would be that "b. He supported religious toleration," since he was a firm believer in fairness and the doctrine of the separation of powers.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Many white southerners felt that federal action in desegregating Little Rock Central High School was similar to action taken dur

gtnhenbr [62]

The correct answer is reconstruction

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Compare and contrast the ways that seventeenth-century

Lina20 [59]

Answer:

<h2>Important differences - Unlike the other two, Charles I was not associated with any political Party, and had not "risen through the ranks" to become Leader. As a King, he achieved his position by heredity, and since no-one can choose their parents, this was used to justify the doctrine of "Divine Right" - God dedcides that a child shall be born into a Royal succession, and it is blasphemy to make any attempt to change this. Similarly, it was therefore the "will of God" that he should be succeeded by one of his children - the eldest son, in the English and Scottish tradition. In England, there was also the unusual situation that, as well as being Head of State, the King was also Head of a particular religious organization - the "Church of England" - which meant that he could not be expected to recognise any other form of Christianity. It was his enforcement of this which aroused resistance by such men as Cromwell, who was against any enofrced religon, and for "liberty of conscience". (This was why Cromwell subsequently also opposed Parliament when it attempted to enforce Presbyterianism,) There is perhaps case for seeing a similarity in Stalin, since "Marxist/Leninist Communism" was in fact a "religion", even though a godless one. There are virtually no comparisons with Hitler.</h2>

3 0

3 years ago