Answer:
This is an incomplete sentence.
Explanation:
Complete sentence has both subject and predicate. Subject is the person who is performing the action and predicate usually contains the verb and the rest part of the sentence. It has complete meaning or makes sense. Incomplete sentence would have either of the two missing.
The given phrase "If I had intended to buy the car" is an incomplete sentence. There should be a second part or predicate of the sentence as well. For example: what would have happened or what would be done, "If I had intended to buy the car". It only mentions the subject part of the sentence.
Answer:
They have the same word root
Explanation:
The word root is part.
The best revision of this sentence is the following:
The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury (it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case) in the hopes of winning the trial.
A pair of parentheses needs to be used in order to separate this information from the rest of the sentence and facilitate reading and comprehension. The information in the parentheses is related to the meaning of the sentence but in some way it interrupts the flow, so a pair of parentheses is necessary in order to indicate this.
I have uploaded a link! The answer is in the file below:
http://www.vegetablefacts.net/vegetable-history/history-of-cabbage/
The correct answer can be C in my opinion....