1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ycow [4]
2 years ago
12

HELP ASAP I WILL UPVOTE The Neutrality Acts (1936-1939) held that the United States

History
2 answers:
Dvinal [7]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The correct answer is D. The Neutrality Acts (1936-1939) held that the United States would not sell war material nor give loans to any nation at war.

Explanation:

The Neutrality Acts were a series of laws in the United States in the 1930s. They were adopted because of the growing conflicts in Europe and Asia, which ultimately led to World War II.

Since World War I, an isolationism developed in the US, which endeavored to keep the country out of external conflicts. Opponents of the law consider them negative today, as they make no distinction between aggressor and victim and both as "belligerents" watch.

The laws required the US president to first determine if a state of war exists. As a result, Franklin D. Roosevelt was forced to seek a backdoor to protect or supply US allies overseas.

drek231 [11]2 years ago
3 0

The Neutrality Acts (1936-1939) held that the United States would not sell war material nor give loans to any nation at war. This implies the correct answer is D

The congress of the United States enacted series of laws also known as Neutrality acts in the 1930s. The neutrality acts prevent the United States from taking part in foreign conflicts. The acts were also passed to addresses some of the threats and wars that resulted in the Second World War.

<h2>Further Explanation</h2>

The introduction of the Neutrality act of 1935 made it illegal for anyone to trade arms or any materials with parties that were involved in the War. The act also admonished the American people not to travel on battleships and further declared that the United States would not be responsible if any of its citizen’s travel on warring ships and become a victim of the Second World War.

The Neutrality act of 1935 was meant to be in operation for six months after it was passed and to ensure the law was applied to the latter, the state department created an office that was compelled to ensure the enforcement of the various provisions of the law.

The Neutrality act of 1936 was introduced by congress to extend the provisions of the Neutrality act of 1935.

The Neutrality act of 1937 prohibits anyone from trading arms with Spain while the Neutrality act of 1939 allowed the trading of arms with France and Great Britain.

LEARN MORE:

  • The Neutrality Acts 1936 to 1939 held that the United States  brainly.com/question/2476272
  • The Neutrality Acts (1936-1939) held that the United States  brainly.com/question/787677

KEYWORDS:

  • world war I
  • united states
  • loans
  • neutrality acts
  • 1930s
You might be interested in
Ik that no one would like to help me with this but my friend goes through depr3ession he is sad his parents fus.s at him and eve
Assoli18 [71]

I would love to check out his chanel

6 0
3 years ago
In a well-written paragraph, explain how the governments of two different countries are similar and different. Use at least two
Ulleksa [173]

In Germany, the power is with the people (=it's a democracy) which are represented by the members of the parliament: it's a representative democracy. It's also a federation of 16 states. 

Iran, on the other hand is a theocracy: a country ruled by the members of the clergy. It can also be named an oligarchy: the power is with a few members of the society.

4 0
3 years ago
There are no seagulls living in my state.
gtnhenbr [62]
Are there answer choices? A good answer if not could be I live in Florida and there are seagulls, so Florida must not be the state referenced.
Deductive reasoning is a specific conclusion that follows a general theory.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help asap! I will give a person the brainliest crown! Inappropriate comment will get report.
Minchanka [31]

Answer:

Yes they can If the government has a compelling interest it is seeking to protect, and the fundamental right the government seeks to restrict is fairly and narrowly regulated by the law in question, the restrictive law may be upheld by the courts.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which event produced a major change in the Roman Empire's religion?
mr_godi [17]
Converting their religion to christianity
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which mental activity is involved in communicating information?
    6·1 answer
  • Outline how technological developments have informally changed the constitution up until now. in the future, what further change
    10·2 answers
  • Why was jazz music so important during the 19s?
    12·1 answer
  • A bill start out as a what
    12·2 answers
  • What was one key requirement that applicants had to meet to receive land under the homestead act
    5·1 answer
  • How do the economic effects of globalization on developing countries compare to those of developed countries?
    15·2 answers
  • What did george washington do to get aid and advice?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following best completes the chart?
    12·1 answer
  • What did Henry David Thoreau do, in order to show his dislike of the war?
    11·1 answer
  • Which item would NOT have been taxed through the Stamp Act? B. Tea A. Playing cards D. A legal document C. A letter​
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!