Finding differences between two things
The Missouri Compromise was an exertion by Congress to defuse the sectional and political competitions activated by the demand of Missouri late in 1819 for affirmation as a state in which subjection would be allowed. At the time, the United States contained twenty-two states, uniformly partitioned amongst slave and free.
Others felt that it made the north appear to be more forceful in its abolitionist servitude perspectives and added to southern hatred, which may have prompted the Civil War happening sooner. The Missouri Compromise was intended to make a harmony amongst slave and non-slave states.
Answer:
It kept people in place and reminded them of there role in society.
Explanation:
According to Patrick Henry, peace with England would only bring English colonists in America oppression or subjugation.
- This is evident when Patrick Henry who was then the governor of Virginia declared at the Second Virginia Convention that peace with England or the British government would only lead to more suppression with no freedom or independence.
- He was famous for stating that "I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Patrick Henry believed that peace with England would only bring English colonists in America oppression or subjugation.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/13473943
Answer:
Investment in the Americas reduced disparities in Europe.