The correct answer <em>"c. social identification with a group can increase ingroup favoritism."</em>.
In the Jigsaw classroom work, Aronson demonstrated that when a group formed of students from different backgrounds is created and each member shares a specific role, there is a reduction in prejudice and stereotyping. Additionally, subjects tended to improve their relationships within-groups and out-groups.
The cave experiment, two groups of individuals from a similar social background were formed and put into a competition between each other. After the tasks they were assigned, there was a clear increase in prejudice and in-group favoritism from members of both groups.
Both experiments had a different focus on the same issue, which was that social affinity increases behaviors of prejudice and stereotypes in regards to other groups.
Answer:
d. Presidents usually factor in the effects that 1st term political activities may have on their reelction bids as they plan their legislative priorities
Explanation:
In a democratic government, elections are held periodically in order to change elected officials. Sometimes an incumbent president may be seeking reelection or it could be that two (or more) new candidates are contesting to become president.
If its re-election, an incumbent president would most likely compare his first term in office and factor in his performance before planning legislative priorities.
Therefore, the statement about presidential reelection that is MOST accurate is option D
Answer:
C point false
Explanation:
Americans have only recently begun to accept the natives. In the past they were treated brutally.
Answer:
Trigger words
Explanation:
Trigger words are words or phrases that a listener emotionally reacts to due to previous experience they've had where that particular word also played a role.
It awakens the subconscious of the listener as it flashes back his/her mind to the incident which happened where same word has occured before.
Under the principles discussed in "A Sample Court Case," United States v. Jones, the court is most likely to rule that the officers' installation of the device was not a search because the officers did not obtain a warrant. Chris's argument was right; there should be a warrant presented for it to be considered as a lawful search.
