The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not include any reference, text, or further context. We do not know what is the topic of controversy.
However, by doing some research we can help you with the following.
If you are referring to the controversy between formal science vs. pseudoscience, then the issues or problems that tend to lead to such controversies are the lack of evidence used by pseudoscientists when trying to prove something.
True scholars and scientists know that the scientific method is the only way to validate a phenomenon. The results can be repeated one, two, and three times, and scientists had to validate the results every single time. Then, we can say that something has scientific support and validation.
On the contrary, pseudoscientists often times do not include validation, just opinions, and general comments based on their own perspectives.
Answer:
The second confiscation act
Explanation:
yeah they are brand names I think but what is the question?
Answer:
The war affected civilians and their property.
Explanation:
I'm in AFJROTC trust me. We just finished out WWI unit.
Answer:
It means that being friendly towards oppressors will not have you get your rights. You cannot sit and wait for people to give you or others equal rights. The only proper way to get them to stop is by force, to hit them where it hurts. You could add the protests/BLM movement in as an example, the fact that policemen who kill innocent Black men and women typically walk free or get a slap on the wrist unless people demand justice.
The quote was made by civil rights activist Thurgood Marshall, the first Black man who served at the Supreme Court.
