The main idea from the passage is most clearly supported by the illustration is
- Men and women are treated differently by law.
According to the question, we are to discuss about main idea from the passage is most clearly supported by the illustration .
As a result if this, we can see that the passage stressed about the way law treat individuals based on gender difference.
Therefore, based on the passage Men and women are treated differently by law.
Learn more about passage at;
brainly.com/question/12555695
Se llama Conspiración de Querétaro al movimiento clandestino nacido en la ciudad de Santiago de Querétaro en 1810. Se toma generalmente como el antecedente inmediato de la Guerra de Independencia de México, dado que este grupo es el que comenzó la lucha armada por la emancipación de la Nueva España con respecto a la Corona. El objetivo primordial de la Conspiración de Querétaro era constituir una junta gubernativa que tomara el poder a nombre de Fernando VII.
es lo único que te puedo informar espero que te sirva de algo.
Answer:
c) Guernica
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
a) the Rap.e of Nanking
b) Stalin's extermination of the Armenians
c) Guernica
d) the Holocaust
The event that Tom refers to is the bombing of Guernica. The bombing of Guernica took place on April 26, 1937, as part of the Spanish Civil War. This aerial bombing took place in the town of Guernica, in the Basque country. This was an important event in the war, as it allowed Franco's capture of Bilbao and his victory in Northern Spain.
Answer:
Beliefs and proof
Explanation:
In my opinion, one of the most hardest challenges that these scientists and Archaeologists face is proof. Is it really the truth? what do i believe? Some <em><u>believe</u></em> that humans originated in Africa over 1.9 million and 135,000 years ago. Note the fact '<em><u>believe</u></em>', have scientists proved this theory of evidence? NO. Do they have human witness of how they looked liked? NO.
All around us there are only theories and beliefs but never proof or evidence.
These are some very crucial factors these scientists face, to be able to actually make people think what they think, to try and convince that even though i may not have proof, our studies and reading are 'vastly' true.
Archaeologists main passion is to understand the past, to collect data and readings, to try and interpret hidden meanings... But have we gotten a conclusion? The origin of man is a very complicated subject. As a Christian i have different beliefs, like others will to.
This brings more frustration for scientists and archaeologists to make space for their beliefs too.
I hope this helps and i hope it cleared a bit of confusion, this is just my opinion.
