Answer:
Part A:
Topic: Both tales deal with the future of human habitation on Mars.
Source:
Article 1
The Case for Mars
By Alexander Fisher
Evidence:
1. "There are many reasons why going to Mars is important" (A.Fisher)
• Getting to Mars is essential for a variety of reasons.
2. "Furthermore, the technology we would need to develop to send humans to Mars would directly benefit our economy here on Earth." (“Question on the case for mars by alexander fisher - Ace ...”)
• It is also worth noting that the technology we would require for a mission to Mars would have a direct impact on our economy.
3. " A mission to Mars should be the next step for NASA." (Fisher)
• NASA should pursue a trip to Mars as its next big goal.
Source:
Mars—A Waste of Time and Money
By Juniper Springs
Evidence:
1. "..., now it is not [for humans] the time to go." (springs)
• Per the statement by Springs for humanity, now is not the time to leave the earth.
2. "That [space research] money would be better spent addressing problems here on Earth." (springs)
• That money should be used to solve issues on Earth, not in space.
3. "It won't be long until our technology is so advanced that a robot will be able to do the same tasks as a human. It is not necessary to go to Mars right now." (springs)
• In the not-too-distant future, a robot will be able to do the same jobs as a person thanks to advances in technology. Going to Mars is not required right now.
Explanation:
Part 1 Graphic Organize
Answer:
Meaning that they touch the ground in only the middle.
Explanation:
It asks to imporve the clarity of what the rocker snowboard is...so.
Hi. You have not submitted the counterclain this question refers to. Which makes it impossible for this question to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
It is only possible to answer this question if you read all the text it refers to and understand the topic of the debate in which King is participating. Next you should read the counterclaim the question is referring to and identify how King might disagree with that.
A containclaim is presented to contest a previously presented argument and a rebuttal is presented to show disagreement with the counterclaim. In this case, King presented an argument, which was challenged by the counterclaim, and then king refuted the counterclaim by showing how incorrect it is.
Answer:
D an ish and Fr isi ans were the two nations
