Answer:D
Explanation:
the others do not make sense.
Some people were critical about Great Britain's imperialist practices because Britain had a history of genocide in other country's they took over.
If scientists made medicine to live forever with no strings attached then maybe I would take it. It depends on who it is handing me it, If it was a bad person then no but if they were good people then maybe, I would only do it if my parents told me to. Did you know Sonnet 65 is by William Shakespeare and is one of several poems that discusses time, aging, and what writing can and cannot do to fight against these forces? Shakespeare's central theme is the opposition between the transitory, delicate nature of beauty and the devastating effect on the beauty of mortality and its principal instrument, time. The opening questions seem rhetorical, indirectly arguing the poet's conviction that beauty is no match for aging and death. Again I wouldn't know what to do if doctors or scientists gave me random medicine then I don't know. I know if the medicine was important then my parents would give it to me not random scientists.
Answer:
Yes, he is correct.
Explanation:
He is right because human intelligence may not be completely dependent on the grades and tests done at younger ages. Intelligence could come in many forms and in many different subjects. Not everything taught at school could be part of someone's intelligence, and that person could have strengths in other topics outside of the grades and tests done.
Ok is there any additional information?
