1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jeyben [28]
4 years ago
9

Please I can’t get this wrong!!

History
1 answer:
enyata [817]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:its b

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Importancia del algodón en la economía de estados unidos​
miskamm [114]

Answer:

lo usaban para aser ropa o cosas que nosotros tambien hoy en dia usamos poreso a los Estados Unidos le inportava mucho

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plzz help with this as soon as possible
Katen [24]
So basically, salt goes to the first free trade, then solidarity goes to talks to discus cuts, detente goes to Russian restructuring, and perestroika goes to French for loosening. Your welcome
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The American railroad industry in the first half of the nineteenth century: a. stimulated the coal mining industry. b. was small
posledela

Answer:

Option: A. Stimulated the coal mining industry.

Explanation:

The industrialization in America began in 1800. With the availability of coal and other natural resources helped the industries to flourish. The railroad industry at the beginning of the 19th century supports coal mining industry to grow rapidly.  Coal became necessary fuel for railways to operate their engines as it became a cheap and efficient source of power for steam engines. As the coal mining expanded in 1900, some coal mine use new methods compared to the old technique of using picks and shovel to extract the coal.

3 0
3 years ago
In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions
Sergio039 [100]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.

I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.

I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.

On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.

8 0
3 years ago
True or false the majority of population growth during the industrial revolution was due to immigration
QveST [7]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • TINKER V. DES MOINES and HAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIER
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT an example of governance that developed by custom?
    12·2 answers
  • Explain how you can use a formula to find the missing side of a right triangle
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a direct cause of job specialization in early human civilizations?
    12·2 answers
  • Elias Howe invented which of the following?
    5·1 answer
  • Rome’s social structure was broken in 2 Parts what were they called ?
    10·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of the World Health Organization (WHO)?
    13·1 answer
  • Why<br> were<br> people unhappy with Lamar's administration?<br> Ready?
    8·1 answer
  • What does this map of British India in 1860 show? provinces ruled by East India Company and trading states provinces ruled by Ea
    11·2 answers
  • What were 2 of Philip II’s failures?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!