There are more compact cars (4*10 = 40) compared to trucks (2*10 = 20); however, the pictogram might make it appear that there are more trucks because the individual truck icon is larger compared to an individual compact car icon.
To anyone giving this image a quick glance, they may erroneously conclude that there are more trucks since their eye would notice the trucks first. Also, the person might think there are more trucks because bigger sizes tend to correspond to more proportion.
In real life, a truck is larger than a compact car, but the icons need to be the same size to have the figure not be misleading.
A very similar issue happens with the mid-size cars vs the compact cars as well. The three mid-size car icons span the same total width as the compact cars do, indicating that a reader might mistakenly conclude that there are the same number of mid-size cars compared to compact ones (when that's not true either).
Is that supposed to be x squared, or x times 2 in the beginning of the first one?
For this case we have that by definition, the equation of a line in the slope-intersection form is given by:
Where:
m: It is the slope of the line
b: It is the cut-off point with the y axis
We have the following points:
Substituting we have:
Thus, the equation is of the form:
We substitute one of the points and find "b":
Finally, the equation is of the form:
Answer:
2400 because it is only 93 away from 2493 and 2353 is more than 93 away
