Answer:
Her brother was born in 1989
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the brother was 7 when Stacy was born in 1996, all you have to do is subtract 7 from 1996 to get 1989 because thats when the brother would be zero years of age.
= <u>187.3 yards</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
The set-up will represent a triangle whereby the :
- Width = Height = 150 yards
- Diagonal = Hypotenuse = 240 yards
- Length = Base = ?
![{a}^{2} = {c}^{2} - {b}^{2} \\ {a}^{2} = {240}^{2} - {150}^{2} \\ {a}^{2} = 57600 - 22500 \\ \sqrt{ {a}^{2} } = \sqrt{35100} \\ a = 187.3yards \: (rounded \: off \: to \: 1dp)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%7Ba%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%20%3D%20%20%7Bc%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%20-%20%20%7Bb%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%20%5C%5C%20%7Ba%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%3D%20%20%7B240%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%20-%20%20%7B150%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%20%5C%5C%20%7Ba%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%3D%2057600%20-%2022500%20%5C%5C%20%20%5Csqrt%7B%20%7Ba%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%7D%20%20%3D%20%20%5Csqrt%7B35100%7D%20%20%5C%5C%20a%20%3D%20187.3yards%20%5C%3A%20%28rounded%20%5C%3A%20off%20%5C%3A%20to%20%5C%3A%201dp%29)
how do i answer that I don't even know that sorry
Answer: choice 2) SAS
AB = DE is one pair of congruent sides that forms the first S in SAS. The other S in SAS refers to the pair of congruent sides BC = EF. The A in SAS is the angle pair angle B = angle E. Note how angle B and angle E are between the two pairs of congruent sides. The order of the letters matters because SAS is different from SSA, which is not a valid congruence argument. Check out the attached image.
Answer:
![7(3+5)=7(3)+7(5)\\15-10=5(3-2)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=7%283%2B5%29%3D7%283%29%2B7%285%29%5C%5C15-10%3D5%283-2%29)
Step-by-step explanation:
Both expressions are examples of the <em>distributive property</em>, which basically says "if I have <em>this </em>many groups of some size and <em>that</em> many groups of the same size, I've got <em>this </em>+ <em>that</em> groups of that size altogether."
To give an example, if I've got <em>3 groups of 5 </em>and <em>2 groups of 5</em>, I've got 3 + 2 = <em>5 groups of 5 </em>in total. I've attached a visual from Math with Bad Drawings to illustrate this idea.
Mathematically, we'd capture that last example with the equation
. We can also read that in reverse: 3 + 2 groups of 5 is the same as adding together 3 groups of 5 and 2 groups of 5; both directions get us 8 groups of 5. We can use this fact to rewrite the first expression like this:
.
This idea extends to subtraction too: If we have 3 groups of 4 and we take away 1 group of 4, we'd expect to be left with 3 - 1 = 2 groups of 4, or in symbols:
. When we start with two numbers like 15 and 10, our first question should be if we can split them up into groups of the same size. Obviously, you could make 15 groups of 1 and 10 groups of 1, but 15 is also the same as <em>3 groups of 5</em> and 10 is the same as <em>2 groups of 5</em>. Using the distributive property, we could write this as
, so we can say that
.