1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lys-0071 [83]
3 years ago
9

Using Source 2, which factor best explains the long time period between when Europeans first explored Louisiana and when Louisia

na was first settled by Europeans?
A: A war between France and Spain in Europe prevented both nations from colonizing the region.b:The Mississippi River was too difficult to navigate in ships from the 1500sC: The swamps, bayous, and hot climate gave Spanish explorers an unfavorable opinion of the region.d:The French saw no possible benefit in further exploration of Louisiana.

History
1 answer:
Luden [163]3 years ago
8 0

Analyzing the timeline, there is a gap of over 200 years between the first time European explorers reached the coasts of Louisiana and the first settlement.This gap can be explained if you consider the evolution of the settlement process in America. It is not a coincidence that the first settlement took place in the early 18th century, when international trade and the need for labor coming from slaves to work in plantations were demanded.

There was not a war between France and Spain which lasted over 200 years that was the cause for not developing a settlement there, although the competition between the European powers for America was not a peaceful one.   Besides that, the Mississipi river, although by the 16th century was an adveture to attempt to cross it, Spaniards were quite good at enduring such challenges, actually, even though DeSoto took over a month to cross the Mississipi it was actually done,they would not give up that easily.

On the other hand, the French did see a benefit on settling in Luisisana, because it was an strategic point to ship different products to Eurpoe,and because it was the main port for slaves´arrival. So, the best answer from these options would be C, because if there was not a developed economy, there was not really a point to use the main advantage of Luisiana which was the access to the sea for trading purposes, that´s why, possibly they did not see the point of losing their lives, getting sick, enduring terrible conditions plus the resistance of different native tribes for  a really uncertain purpose at the time.

You might be interested in
Without copying and pasting, answer these 2 questions,.
DedPeter [7]
The stamp act is what started the creation of stamps and the tax on them and the patriots hated the stamp act and has a really terrible reaction
8 0
2 years ago
How did the various achievements and policies of Muhammad’s successors help the Arab world to grow?
bazaltina [42]

There are many ways the policies and achievements of Muhammad's successors helped the Arab world. One of the main achievement was to unite the Arab under one flag instead of various tribes and communities, as the successors of Muhammad used the term "Khalifa" which was considered a unanimous leader of all the Muslims thus any territory that came under Islamic rule or any people who accepted Islam were united behind "Khlifa" instead of various leaders and tribal heads.<span>
As there was a central system established in that time of succession, more focus was placed on developmental structures. For example in the time of Umar, the second successor various facilities were built for the travelers and those out on the road.
<span>Trade and commerce evolved due to peace and stability provided by the central government as opposed to earlier times when caravans were looted in other tribal territories. </span></span>

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes the Great Plains?
AleksAgata [21]
The answer would be C
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were American soldiers were fearful of the war in the Pacific?
BlackZzzverrR [31]

Answer:

Mostly they were eager to put themselves in danger. Only a small % would ever surrender

So I would say in general they were not motivated by fear of Allied Forces just of fellow opinion.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How were peter the great and king charles 1 of england silmilar?
zaharov [31]
Like Peter the Great, Charles I went through the most opposition to his rule from the nobility. They were both very important leaders. They both had outstanding tolerance, and not only for religion. 
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What words would you use to describe the main ideas, or principles, of the Constitution
    7·1 answer
  • What describes the abbasid muslim capital of baghdad in the years 762-1258?
    10·1 answer
  • Will give brainliest.... Answer this ASAP<br>What is Magna Carta? <br>​
    7·1 answer
  • Did the German public know about the concentration camps?
    9·2 answers
  • The establishment of the _______brought representative government to England.
    15·1 answer
  • How did Socrates teach? What is this method of teaching called?
    7·2 answers
  • The Framers, people who drafted the US Constitution, provided for a separation of powers in the federal government by
    14·1 answer
  • Samuel Slater was important to the industrialization of America because he A. used his knowledge to build the nation's first wat
    7·2 answers
  • What impact did the Espionage and sedition Acts have on free speech
    6·2 answers
  • What were two things that had to be considered at the close of the Civil War in regards to Reconstruction?(select all that apply
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!