1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
luda_lava [24]
4 years ago
7

"Why did the civilizations of Sumer and Egypt not last? What could they have done better to last longer?"

History
1 answer:
julsineya [31]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

They weren't strong enough to fend off hunger and attackers.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did the sugar act cause tension between the colonists and britains
Arisa [49]
That tea was worth literally millions of dollars which obviously upset british and they were already in dept from the "French Indian War" the act of throwing the tea into the Boston harbor also showed that the colonists were not afraid of <span>revolting!!! <3</span>
8 0
3 years ago
How did the Age of Enlightenment affect the legal standing of slavery in the American colonies and in France. What was different
Allisa [31]

Answer:

The intellectual movement, known as the Enlightenment urged individuals to think for themselves rather than aimlessly following position, be it mainstream or strict. All of us in invested with reason, so the scholars of the Enlightenment contended, and we should draw upon that load of reason in exploring our way through life's numerous dangerous parkways and byways.

In connection to political life, reason must be utilized to develop suffering organizations that will give us appropriate edified administration rather than the oppression to which a foolish adherence to custom and convention regularly lead.

This was correctly what the American pioneers tried to do. Saturated with Enlightenment thinking, they intentionally set out to construct an arrangement of government on reasonable standards. Rather than aimlessly obliging the framework that they'd acquired from the British, they left upon a profoundly aspiring and exceptional undertaking of state-fabricating that would fuse illuminated standards.

4 0
4 years ago
Which term best defines the geography of Japan?
swat32
Why don't you try Archipelago. hope I help you.
6 0
3 years ago
How did expansionism pave the way for world war ii?
Finger [1]

The expansionism was the primary goal of the axis power. Germany, Italy, and Japan all had leaders that wanted to expand the territory of their countries. The main reason for the expansionist policies were the resources, as the resources would have made these countries much stronger, economically independent, and they were going to be able to develop significantly, becoming global powers.

Germany wanted to expand its territory in order to make living space for its population, as well as to gain control of the natural resources of big portion of Europe and the oil in the Caucasus. Italy wanted to restore the long gone Roman Empire, to invade the majority of the territories that this empire ruled, and have excellent strategic location and lot of natural resources. Japan had very few and very little natural resources. The rulers saw that the country would need lot of natural resources in their possession in order to prosper, so they went to invade the regions that were rich in certain natural resources. This type of politics prompted a response from the Allies so they declared a war on them in order to stop them, thus the World War II began.

4 0
3 years ago
CAN SOMEONE HELP ME PLZ!!
baherus [9]

Answer: Yes the US should have gone to war. There are two sides to the topic, Yes and No. Yes because if we did not go to war with mexico we would not own all the present 50 states. No because war is expensive.

Explanation:

So for Yes you could write. The United States should have gone to war with mexico because, if they didn't then the United states would not be what it is today. A second reason is we needed the resources they had on there territory.

For no you could write. The United States should not have gone to war with mexico because, war is expensive for ammo and troops, a second reason is it was expensive for allies and reinforcements, and shipment.

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What’s the main idea of this document?
    7·1 answer
  • What colonies were in the new england colonies?
    12·1 answer
  • How did trusts and holding companies create unofficial monopolies?
    10·1 answer
  • Who should have possession of the city of Jerusalem, the Jews or the Palenstinians?
    5·1 answer
  • Identify three facts used to describe the horrors found at Buchenwald
    6·1 answer
  • Based on Benito Mussolini's political philosophy, which of the following policies do you think he would have supported after tak
    10·1 answer
  • NEED HELP ASAP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
    11·1 answer
  • I'm located just below Georgia. Candidates battle it out for my 29 electoral votes. Whether I tip red
    10·1 answer
  • The concept of centralizing governmental power. In this process, large amounts of land and people come under the control of a si
    7·1 answer
  • How many men went with him into his exile?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!