Answer:
The similarities are very distinct.
Explanation:
So the gestapos were the official secret police of Nazi Germany and German-occupied Europe. The force was created by Hermann Göring in 1933 by combining the various security police agencies of Prussia into one organisation. And what they did was kill and or torture anyone who was against the Nazi party or Hitler at that time. They we’re also responsible for the roundup of Jews throughout Europe for deportation to extermination camps. They helped imply and create the scapegoating against people who were Jewish all over Nazi-occupies Europe. Mr. Thurgood Marshall felt like he was seeing the same thing in The United States as well. He explains this in an authoritative report aptly titled "The Gestapo in Detroit, " which was lead by the NAACP, showing beyond reasonable dispute that local police had joined a mob of whites in terrorizing black neighborhoods, this was happening in Detroit in 1943 around the same time as the Second World War. So this makes sense that he could make this correlation. Two minority groups from different places around the world we’re facing brutality from the police and hate groups about things they cannot change. For the diverse people of Detroit it was their skin colour for the Jewis and “non-aryan” race of Germany and Europe it was religion or family history for example. So both ways these people were being prosecuted by law enforcement and Thurgood Marshall believed if the gestapos happened even more in the USA they couldn’t be stopped or changed and it would end in many innocent people being killed or tortured just like what the gestapo did for Hitler in Europe.
<span>E. One relied on multilateralism and the other was unilateral almost to a fault.
</span>How did the foreign policy doctrines of the two Bush Presidents differ?
NOT:
A. One relied on multilateralism and the other was too idealistic.
B. One required the promotion of democracy, while the other specifically prevented it.
C. One was almost exclusively focused on building free markets, while the other was all about protection.
<span>D. One incorporated multilateralism and ignored alliances; the other focused solely on building a strong defense.</span>
Answer:
Roman Empire: Centred on Rome, Latin was the official language, Roman Catholic church.
Byzantine empire: Centred on Constantinople, Greek was the official language, Eastern Orthodox Church.
Explanation:
Rome was one of the important and most powerful civilisations that ruled much of Europe for almost 1000 years. Latin and Greek were its official languages. Latin was their original language and remained the language of military, legislation and administration throughout the classical period. <em>After the fall of Roman Empire in 476, the catholic church was competing with the Arian Christians to convert the barbarian tribes</em> and became the dominant form of Christianity. In Roman Catholicism monastic communities were centres for learning and preservation of classical culture.
Greek civilisation lasted from the Greek Dark ages to the end of antiquity. It was at its climax under the rule of Alexander the Great. He conquered Syria, Judea, Gaza, Anatolia, Egypt , Persia , Mesopotamia and Bactria. Greek Orthodox church is related to Byzantine Empire because its history, theology and traditions are related to Early church fathers and the Culture of Byzantine. <em>They conformed to the christian faith as represented in the creeds of the early church. </em>
The already poor countries look brightly on the idea of social conformity and taking care of each person. However the failures a socialism are seen when poor countries simply become poorer because there is decreased competition such as Venezuela.
a - 4
b - 2
c --3
d - 1
Explanation:
<u>The 12th Amendment made a foundation change</u> in the process of the elections of the President and Vice President to make it more democratic and to have more people have a say in it.
T<u>he 20th amendment finalized the term dates</u> of Presidents and their cabinets and had laws for when there was no clear winner at the ballot.
<u>The 23rd amendment happened due to common demand</u> and allowed DC voters on the poll
<u>The 25th amendment came out of the tragic necessity </u>after John F Kennedy's assassination.
