Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Americans value equality and in Wilson's Fourteen points, colonial claims were adjusted according to the territories needs. Open communication was also highlighted as Americans value public understandings. Competition and free enterprise were obviously addressed in the Fourteen Points as well.
Answer:
To quote Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, "Section 3 of the Recovery Act (15 USCA 703) is without precedent. It supplies no standards for any trade, industry, or activity. It does not undertake to prescribe rules of conduct to be applied to particular states of fact determined by appropriate administrative procedure. Instead of prescribing rules of conduct, it authorizes the making of codes to prescribe them. For that legislative undertaking, section 3 sets up no standards, aside from the statement of the general aims of rehabilitation, correction, and expansion described in section 1. In view of the scope of that broad declaration and of the nature of the few restrictions that are imposed, the discretion of the President in approving or prescribing codes, and thus enacting laws for the government of trade and industry throughout the country, is virtually unfettered. We think that the code-making authority thus conferred is an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power."
Explanation:
Hope this helped!
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Industrial_Recovery_Act_of_1933
Answer:
here
Explanation:
The Berlin wall divided families who found themselves unable to visit each other. Many East Berliners were cut off from their jobs. West Berliners demonstrated against the wall and their mayor Willy Brandt led the criticism against the United States who they felt had failed to respond.
The best option is B.Socialism
Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez was elected to his post in 1998 with 56.2% of the vote and convened two Referendum of Approval the following year. In the first one (04/25/99) the citizens approved the convocation to a constituent assembly to reform the Constitution of Venezuela in 1961, and in the second (15/12/99) the people approved the Constitution drafted by the Constituent Assembly.
The first referendum asked: "Do you summon the National Constituent Assembly with the purpose of transforming the State and generating a new legal order that allows the functioning of a Social and Participative Democracy?" and "You agree with the Executive's proposals ..."
The second referendum asked for itself or not if you approve the Constitution drafted by the National Constituent Assembly.
In short, the people voted to approve a Constitution that would allow the development of a Social and Participative Democracy. The government of Hugo Chavez was called Socialism of the 21st Century.
Since democracy was already existing in Venezuela before, we can say that the best answer is B.Socialism.