Vice President
Explanation is right there
There are a couple of differences:
1) The Americas (especially Latin America), will not have Roman Catholic influences in the area, and will not have it as their state religion.
2) The land will keep most of it's natural wealth, though it may not be used in great quantities as before.
3) Population will not take a hit, and will continue to grow, as European diseases are not spread to them. However, if trading occurs between the north-eastern tribes all the way down to Central America, they will still be exposed to diseases carried by the French and British.
4) They may not be exposed to the usage of firearms as quickly, which may lead to their demise to their native enemies. Firearms, while they took very long to reload back then, was a symbol of power and was used more as a shock then as a weapon (until the mini-ball, repeater, and other upgrades to the rifle came).
5) The other way to look at it is that another European Power may take over those lands. The first of which is Portugal, whose lands were very near the Spanish territory. The next in line would be France, which borders the Spanish territories, and than Britain.
~
"Nazism and fascism have some similarities" "Hitler ruled as a dictator and encouraged the people to maintain a "pure race." and "<span>In a fascist government, worker strikes are never allowed" are all correct, since Hitler appealed to Germany unity. </span>
<span>The Missouri compromise achieved the goal of ending the expansion of slavery into newer territories in the United States. Missouri was entered into the Union as a slave-state as long as the other Western territories were not supporting slavery.</span>
I’m not sure how many they gained but i do know that they had 53 seats after the 2010 census
