The one which has following has an unreliable narrator is You think you know everything, don’t you? You think you are so smart up there on your high horse. You love to look down on people. You love to judge people. You are just the worst. So don’t think I care about you. I am going to ignore you and go along with my plan. So I will be the ruler of this world soon, and you will bow down to my power. The best part is you cannot stop me. My plan is perfect and so shall the world. Thus the correct answer is D.
<h3>What is a narrator?</h3>
A narrator refers as a person who conveys or portrays the story. He may or may not be the author as the author is one who writes any stores wherever the narrator is the person who narrates the thought as a third person in the story.
The most common application of an unreliable narrator is in first-person narratives since they are untrustworthy storytellers. Readers are really being encouraged to doubt the narrator's authority as a storyteller by the unreliable narration. This kind of narrator offers confusing tales and inadequate explanations.
Therefore, option D is the appropriate answer.
Learn more about the narrator, here:
brainly.com/question/12020368
#SPJ5
No.
if the sentence was the other way around, you would need a comma. ie: Because she studied really hard, Shauna got an A in her chemistry test.
Answer:
C) is the greatest option because it clearly explains the causes for the false warning and its impact.
Explanation:
This passage from "The Great Fire" features a cause-and-effect framework that helps viewers comprehend why firemen responded ineffectively. We're told that the initial mistake was made by one man, Schaffer, who struck a different box than would have been optimum. He quickly understood that wasn't the case and ordered box 319 to be struck. The second error is made by Schaffer's assistant, William. He refuses to do as he is told, despite the fact that the instruction came from his supervisor. Firefighters are perplexed by his audacity since he hits the wrong box. As a result, the fire was not effectively battled, and it burned for several terrible minutes because firms didn't know what to do.
The opportunity cost of going to a night party instead of babysitting at home is:
- The benefit of taking care of the baby adequately and completing your work that you would have gained from babysitting that night.
<h3>What is an opportunity cost?</h3>
This is the loss of value or benefit that would have been incurred by engaging in an activity rather than engaging in an alternative activity.
The opportunity cost in this scenario is the value of what you gave up in other to attend the party, which was to babysit the child and take proper care of the baby.
In conclusion, an opportunity cost is the loss of other alternatives when one alternative is already chosen.
Read more about <em>opportunity cost</em> here:
brainly.com/question/481029
