Which would be better, in terms of quality of life: to be a Roman slave or a lower-caste Indian?

1 answer:

6 0

It is better to be a Roman Slave. While lower caste indians or "Untouchables" were usually free, they were outcasts from society and were marked as dirty people that must never be touched. The roman slaves, though subjected to harsh labor and possible death, were given the option of freedom if they work for it. Slaves would sometimes be able to become soldiers and work for freedom that way while others might become free due to a sympathetic owner. During the later years of the roman empire, freed male slaves were even allowed to live quietly and vote. Does this answer your Question?

You might be interested in

please answer I need the answer. What was one major outcome of the Bush v. Gore Supreme Court ruling? A. George W. Bush became p

Marat540 [252]

Answer:

A. George W. Bush became president of the United States.

B. Florida was forced to allow third parties on its ballots.

C. The voting age was reduced to 18 for presidential elections.

D. Closed primaries were ruled unconstitutional and banned,

Explanation:

The Supreme Court, in a per curiam opinion, ruled that the Florida Supreme Court's decision, calling for a statewide recount, violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This ruling was by a 7–2 vote, though per curiam opinions are usually issued only for unanimous votes.

3 0

3 years ago

Radio and television media perform a public service in the field of political education by ________.

solong [7]

Answer:

interviewing people who are in the news.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

What was the goal of the RPF when they invaded Rwanda in 1990?

kodGreya [7K]

Answer:

Western observers have stated that the RPF prioritized taking power over saving lives or stopping the genocide. The RPF victory was complete when Kigali was captured on 4 July and the rest of the country on 18 July. The RPF's Pasteur Bizimungu was installed as President of Rwanda, with Kagame appointed vice president.

8 0

3 years ago

What was the significance of the end of white primary?

vodka [1.7K]

Answer:

In that case, the Court ruled that the 1923 Texas state law was unconstitutional, because it allowed the state Democratic Party to racially discriminate. After the case, most Southern states ended their selectively inclusive white primaries.

5 0

3 years ago

When as the new deal passed

taurus [48]

There are actually two New Deals: the first one launched in 1933. The second, and most aggressive and famous one, launched in 1935

8 0

3 years ago