1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Valentin [98]
3 years ago
11

Which would be better, in terms of quality of life: to be a Roman slave or a lower-caste Indian?

History
1 answer:
Veronika [31]3 years ago
6 0

It is better to be a Roman Slave. While lower caste indians or "Untouchables" were usually free, they were outcasts from society and were marked as dirty people that must never be touched. The roman slaves, though subjected to harsh labor and possible death, were given the option of freedom if they work for it. Slaves would sometimes be able to become soldiers and work for freedom that way while others might become free due to a sympathetic owner. During the later years of the roman empire, freed male slaves were even allowed to live quietly and vote. Does this answer your Question?

You might be interested in
How did trade under Mexican rule help the people of California?
Bogdan [553]

Answer:

1. Mexican Government gave away land grants so people could use the land to raise animals and grow crops.

2. Trade between other countries were allowed so that ranchos could buy and sell goods.

Hope this helped :)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Northwest Ordinance was an act that provided rules for governing the
laila [671]

Explanation:

it paved the way for Ohio become the 17th state of the United States. It also with some minor modifications, established process for admission to United States for all states since 1787.

5 0
2 years ago
Where did Czar Nicholas I exile suspected dissenters?
Paul [167]
The correct answer is Siberia

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Three reasons why Britain became a global power
Travka [436]

At the time the great European powers were all in a race to take the most land (and Britain won). Britain also had the best navy and could project power. Britain won some wars against European nations and took their colonies. During that time the "United Kingdom" for formed. And Company Raj (Company Rule) with the East India Company in India made Britain more and more wealthy. After all, if you control much of the world you can get very rich and control much of the trade. Britain also had a lot of Soft Power in addition to its hard power (the military).
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the type of diplomacy where you
Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

A

Explanataion:

because A is used to ensure the financial stability of a region while protecting and extending U.S. commercial and financial interests

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Athens, Sparta, and Corinth are all examples of Greek
    6·1 answer
  • What legislation signed into law in 1940 indicated Roosevelt’s commitment to war preparedness?
    5·2 answers
  • In what way(s) did the
    14·1 answer
  • True or false? The governor must sign into law all bills passed by both houses of the legislature.
    8·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast some of the positive and negative aspects of the Industrial Revolution within the United States.
    7·1 answer
  • Elsenhower's that the fall of one nation to Communism would lead to others
    6·2 answers
  • If nondisjunction occurs and an individual survives, which disorder can occur?
    5·1 answer
  • This is master Obi-wan Kenobi. I regret to report that both our jedi order and republic have fallen, with dark shadows of the em
    14·2 answers
  • Sentences on whether the United States should have helped Germany recover from World War II.
    5·1 answer
  • Who are the two of the original six civilizations that emerged from the american continent?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!