1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Valentin [98]
3 years ago
11

Which would be better, in terms of quality of life: to be a Roman slave or a lower-caste Indian?

History
1 answer:
Veronika [31]3 years ago
6 0

It is better to be a Roman Slave. While lower caste indians or "Untouchables" were usually free, they were outcasts from society and were marked as dirty people that must never be touched. The roman slaves, though subjected to harsh labor and possible death, were given the option of freedom if they work for it. Slaves would sometimes be able to become soldiers and work for freedom that way while others might become free due to a sympathetic owner. During the later years of the roman empire, freed male slaves were even allowed to live quietly and vote. Does this answer your Question?

You might be interested in
The weaknesses of the treaty is that it
Harlamova29_29 [7]
The answer is true.
Explanation is that I just learned about this topic last week and passed the test with this question on it.
5 0
3 years ago
At the Council of Trent, all of the following beliefs were supported EXCEPT: a. the need for ceremonies b. the Catholic and Angl
grin007 [14]
B. the Catholic and Anglican Churches were equal in the eyes of God
The purpose of the Council was to denounce alleged heresies by the Protestant Church.
7 0
3 years ago
Doubled the size of the United States
charle [14.2K]

The U.S is about the same size as the Sahara Desert. So Double that is would still be pretty small compared to the rest of the world/.

5 0
3 years ago
How many original amendments to the constitution were added and ratified by 1791
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]
10 amendments, these ten are also known as the bill of rights, and they were the federalists concession to the anti-federalists so that they would accept and ratify the constitution as a whole.
6 0
3 years ago
Why did Wilson refuse to recognize the government of<br> Huerta in Mexico?
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

because huerta was letting people like pancho villa on the loose witch got him mad and he decided not to acknowledge his government

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What best describes the Bourbon Triumvirate?
    7·1 answer
  • Which item was part of the Populist Party''s platform? A. election of U.S. senators by state legislatures B. consumer protection
    15·3 answers
  • _was the policy designed to give hitler what he wanted as away to avoid war. A. Containment B . Appeasement C. Isolationism D .
    15·2 answers
  • What specifically was Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. speaking out against when he made this statement in 1958? “I could never adjust
    10·2 answers
  • In American society, romantic love is considered the main reason for people to marry. On the other hand, in some societies, roma
    13·1 answer
  • Which factor contributed most to the issue depicted in this cartoon?
    10·2 answers
  • Why is Ancient Greece civilization so legendary? Or so well-known?
    5·1 answer
  • HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP ASAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
    8·2 answers
  • The First Congress established three
    10·1 answer
  • Which African American musician had his own television show in the 1950s?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!