I think the impact that "muckracking" had on Americans was this:
Due to the mishaps and the loss of trust that some Americans may have for their own, state, county, or even government that used some points of "muckracking" to begin. The best examples of "muckracking" in history can be accountable in today's day in age of the 21st Century. Now, for the most recent events on the other hands we could go on about lists and lists about things such as Donald Trump and Stormy Daniels and so on and so forth (But we won't talk about those begin again, this is only meant to answer your question, not bring up another :D but then again, we all differ from opinion) Now back to the point- I think that the best common examples of "muckracking' in today's society would be through celebrities and politicians. Many of the paparazzi try to capture celebrity photos, but also grab their opinions about things, but then twist and divert the story in a whole other way. But the same goes for politicians except using a different method. Anyways this is my opinion on how I see "muckracking" and how it has impacted Americans.
I hope my opinion and answer to your question was able to clear up some things. If you have any more questions about this or need another opinion on it- or if you simply just have another question that you would like to have answered, please check out my profile and I will be happy to do so. Again, I hope this was helpful to you, have a wonderful day! :)
Answer:
Becasue it was a part of there culture
Explanation:
Answer:
<h2><em>
Convince people that the constitution contain safeguards against government becoming too strong.</em></h2>
Explanation:
This was made to ensure that the government did not get too overpowered to where the people where being oppressed.
The South thought that its secession from the Union would succeed because:
C. The South only had to defend itself against the North, not defeat it.
Answer:
see below *ALSO SPELL CHECK PLEASE GRAMMERLY ISNT WORKING FOR SOME REASON*
Explanation:
In the persepctive of the German people, the post-war punishment that would be percieved as the "harshest" or "most upsetting" was most likely punishment 1,4 and 5, and the ones that were probably viewed as the "east harsh" or insignificant to the German people was punishment 8. The reason that I assume that the harshest, most significant, and most upsetting punishment(s) were 1,4, and 5 is because these are the punishments that effected the german people <em>directly. </em>The loss of land probably led to relocation and people losing homes, property, etc. The fact that Germany has to take the blame for the war led to racism and prosecution of the German people, many of which had nothing to do with the war and wanted it to end as much as everyone else. And, lastly, punishment 5 was one of the most upsetting because the debt that Germany went into (-33 billion dollars!) will no doubt have caused inflammation of prices, poverty, and lack of resources due to low government funding, which would have effected the people the most, especially those who depended on government help and were not doing well financially to begin with. The punishment that was probably the least significant to the German people was 8, "force all military leaders, including Kaiser Wilhelm II to face trials for war crimes". This is because the people did not have a direct relation with any of these leaders, so it does not concern them as much as punishments like 1,4 and 5 did.