Answer:
The "Americanization" of immigrants during the early 1900s could be depicted as the "softer" side in the "clash of cultures." Rather than exclude immigrants, Americanization programs sought to integrate and assimilate aliens by teaching them English and by instructing them in the workings of American democracy.
Explanation:
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "Westernization and commoditization overlook peripheral countries and provide no incentives for their involvement in international trade" the greatest effect of the westernization and commoditization of culture is that <span>Westernization and commoditization overlook peripheral countries and provide no incentives for their involvement in international trade</span>
Yes that is true that t<span>here were more women in English America than in new Spain and
new France, which led to greater equality for women in the
English colonies. The Quakers gave women an active role in Churches also,
and more women joined Churches for the fear of childbirth. </span>
The Stamp Act impacted more people in the colonies and hurt the people economically whereas the Sugar Act was not hurting business in the colonies. Merchants in New England were actually able to make more money off of the act.
The Sugar Act place a tax on sugar and molasses as well as attempting to end the smuggling trade taking place with the Dutch and French. Though these products were more expensive it actually helped many merchants make more money without the competition of other countries.
The Stamp Act required a tax on all government stamps. The stamps were necessary for all contracts and official government documents. Those involved in trade needed more stamps than others and therefore greatly protested the added tax. The Stamp Act was so protested that violence was used against the stamp collectors and led to the act being repealed a year after passage.
