Answer:
a breakthrough project
Explanation:
Having competitive advantage <em>implies</em> being in a condition or circumstance that puts an organisation in a favorable business position.
Therefore, a Breakthrough Project would create a competitive advantage that enables the organization to earn a greater than normal return on investment than its competitors, because it is like a<em> disruptive innovation.</em>
Answer:
correct option is $0
Explanation:
given data
purchased truck = $270,000
transportation and calibration costs = $30,000
life = 20 years
financed period = 15 year
solution
we know here that some expenses like insurance and depreciation etc is allocated by systematic and the rational procedure for some period
so that during that period related asset is expected to provide the benefit
and acquisition of capital asset is not record as expenses
we know appropriate property and plant or the equipment assets account are debit on purchases
so that Depreciation expenses are recorded to reflect the allocation of costs of the asset to operation over service life of assets
so here correct option is $0
A $2 bill is worth 200 pennies, 20 dimes, 4 half dollars, and 25 nickels.
Hope this helps :)
Calculate total variable cost by multiplying the cost to make one unit of your product by the number of products you've developed. For example, if it costs $60 to make one unit of your product, and you've made 20 units, your total variable cost is $60 x 20, or $1,200.
Hope this helps have a great day :)
Answer: No it is not.
Explanation:
Uber by first establishing itself and then fighting regulators leaves itself open to attack around the world. This is because the Regulators have the power to keep adjusting the laws that govern Uber if they feel that Uber has an unfair advantage or if it's existence is detrimental to the society. Uber has been accused many times of various infractions such as Tax Evasions and being a conduit through which crime can be committed because it did not conduct proper background checks.
Going back to the issue of taxes, if the regulators feel that Uber may be avoiding taxes, they could impose laws that either cause an increase in Uber prices or remove them from a location which can have a native influence on Uber's bottomline.
This approach is not good because regulators do not like being fought and will try to ascert dominance. It is simply not viable and this has been proven with Uber's many suspensions around the world.