Explanation: President Pro Tempore
The Constitution provides for a president pro tempore to preside over the Senate in the absence of the vice president. Except for the years from 1886 to 1947, the president pro tempore has been included in the presidential line of succession. Following passage of the Presidential Succession Act of 1792, the president pro tempore was next in line after the vice president, and followed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives. In 1886 a new law removed the president pro tempore and the Speaker from the line of succession, substituting cabinet officers. A 1947 law changed the order of succession to place the Speaker of the House in line after the vice president, followed by the president pro tempore, and then the secretary of state and other cabinet officers in order of their departments' creation. This is the system in effect today.
Hope this helps :D
Answer:
1- INTERNAL CORRUPTION 2 -INTERNAL CONFLICS ABOUT TAXATION
Explanation:
1- INTERNAL CORRUPTION
My emperor, as a loyal servent of your majesty to resolve this firs problem I hambly suggest you to make the corrupt ones examples of your justice, everyone who is cought on the act will have to give half of his foryune to poor people and temples and the other half to the safe of your majesty.
2 -INTERNAL CONFLICTS ABOUT TAXATION
My emperor, as a loyal servent of your majesty to resolve this firs problem I hambly suggest you to make the corrupt ones examples of your justice, first you must stablish very fair taxes, anyone who refuses to pay a fair taxation stablished by your majesty will have to pay 10 times more for the same value during a year.
<em>The Stamp Act</em>
Explanation:
The Stamp Act was passed in 1765 and was a tax that Great Britain put on the colonists. Paper products such as newspapers and legal documents now had this tax on them, which sometimes contained a seal or a stamp which proved the purchaser paid the tax on the product.
The colonists were not happy with the Stamp Act and they felt as if it was unfair that they were being taxed. They had nobody to vouch for them in the British Parliament, which is called "taxation without representation." They started to get angry and boycott the products that contained the tax, even sometimes becoming violent and harming British merchants.
On the other hand, Great Britain deemed its taxing to be fair. The French and Indian War was expensive and since it was fought on American soil, they believed the colonists should pitch in. They also said the tax was unfair because they were using their own soldiers to protect the colonists.
The colonists still did not agree with this. They were very strongly against the Stamp Act and even being taxed in general. This would eventually start to hurt British merchants and businesses, which made Great Britain realize this tax was doing more harm than good. They then repealed the Stamp Act in 1766.
