I would say that the stirrup allowed for quicker mounting of the horse, and it may have caused horses to be used in battle more frequently.
I believe it may be B or C sorry if it's wrong ><
The answer really depends on whether the farmer is also the landlord or only a worker in the fields, and bearing in mind that the question refers only to Chavez’ reforms, not what is now called Chavismo, that is to say, the rule of President Maduro.
If the first, then there are chances that the landlord would feel threatened about the fact this his land could be —although not necessarily— appropriated by the State, but also, he might feel relieved to learn that his land could be more productive since there would be a lot more subsidies for farming since the oil revenues of the country would again be in the hands of the State.
If it is the second possibility, the farmer most likely would feel relieved altogether since subsidies to labor power and farming would mean greater income and better living conditions for him and his family.
Answer:
I would say C.
Explanation:
The Union did gain control of the Mississippi River and used that power during the war as another way of fighting against the Confederacy.
Sorry if wrong..
