Answer:
D). are completely different from one another because while the theologian must be a believer in the tradition they study, the academic historical-critical scholar must be an atheist.
Explanation:
The key difference that exists between <u>the theological study and academic study of religion is that theology lays emphasis on studying the nature of God or other supernatural forces and faith associated to it while academic study focuses upon critically examining a specific religious belief or behavior from an outlander's perspective</u>.
Thus, the theologian is necessarily a believer as he/she aims to understand how the character of transcendental forces(implying they believe it) while 'the academic historical-critical scholar must be an atheist' as then only he would be able to do critical study without any bias. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
True, before the early 20th century, Russia was known as an agricultural society.
He thought he should extend his borders because he wanted us to have benefits of our democratic government,that should be extended over distant regions which was selected for homes
Wealth, power, and prestige--these three elements make up Weber's theory of social class.
In the case above, both have power over others, but their wealth is likely different as the self-made man is a millionaire and lawyers don't typically make that much. The biggest difference would likely be the level of prestige or respect each would get from others. The US values the self-made man over a lawyer.
