Answer: The price elasticity of demand for good A is 0.67, and an increase in price will result in a increase in total revenue for good A
Explanation:
The following can be deduced form the question:
P1 = $50
P2 = $70
Q1 = 500 units
Q2 = 400 units
Percentage change in quantity = [Q2 - Q1 / (Q2 + Q1) ÷ 2 ] × 100
Percentage change in price = [P2 - P1 / (P2 + P1) ÷ 2 ] × 100
% change in quantity = (400 - 500)/(400 + 500)/2 × 100
= -100/450 × 100
= -22.22%
% change on price = (70 - 50)/(70 + 50)/2 × 100
= 20/60 × 100
= 33
Price elasticity of demand = % change in quantity / % change on price
= -22.22 / 33
= -0.67
This means that a 1% change in price will lead to a 0.67% change in quantity demanded. As there was a price change, there'll be a little change in quantity demanded because demand is inelastic. Thereby, he increase in price will lead to an increase in the total revenue.
Therefore, the price elasticity of demand for good A is 0.67, and an increase in price will result in an increase in total revenue for good A
Answer:
It’s when you convince people to buy a product, or service. Marketing is used in this.
Explanation:
Answer:
The total turnover increases
Explanation:
Asset Turnover Ratio is a measure of how efficient the assets of a company is when compared with the company's sales or revenue. To calculate Asset turnover ration, the<u> net sales is set as a percentage of the company's total assets. </u>
The higher the turnover of the asset based on the calculation then the higher the chances that organisation is generating revenue efficiently from its assets. A lower turnover however is the implication that the company is not efficiently using its assets and it could imply some internal issues.
Therefore, the higher the sales without any change in assets means the Asset Turnover will increase or be higher and it will indicate higher efficiency
Answer:
a) the leader presents ideas and invites questions.
Explanation:
Leadership continuum is a leadership style which describes the relationship with respect to the autonomy that a manager gives to his subordinates, and the level of authority used by him/ her. This is a inverse proportional relation which reduces the authority of the manager when team's freedom increases. It debases an autocratic rule by a manager, especially in taking decisions.
The example cited in the question is a way of taking decision by suggestions by expecting questions from his team.
Answer:
$18,000
Explanation:
Given data for Taylor Company;
Salaries payable at the beginning of 2015 (end of 2014) = $18,000
Salary expense during the year (2015) = $50,000
Salaries paid during the year = $50,000
Salary payable at end of year (2015) = ?
Let the salary payable at end of year= S
Using the formula
Salaries payable at the beginning of the year + Salary expense during the year - Salaries paid = Salary payable at end of year
$18,000 + $50,000 - $50,000 =S
S = $18,000
Salaries payable as at December 31, 2015 is $18,000.