Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World.
In the 1400s, Spain and Portugal were competing to explore down the coast of Africa and find a sea route to Asia. That way, they could have the prized Asian spices they wanted without having to pay high prices to Venetian and Muslim middlemen. Spanish and Portuguese sailors searching for that sea route conquered the Canary Islands and the Azores. Soon they began building Muslim-style sugar plantations on the islands, some of them staffed by slaves purchased from nearby Africa. One sailor came to know these islands particularly well because he traded in "white gold"—sugar. And then, as he set off on his second voyage across the sea to what he thought was Asia, he carried sugar cane plants from Gomera, one of the Canary Islands, with him on his ship. His name was Christopher Columbus.
How do the details in the passage most support the central idea?
Answer:
The details describe how Spanish and Portuguese explorations helped expand the sugar trade.
Explanation:
The passage explained how the sugar trade expanded. Using the historical evidence of Spanish and Portuguese exploration to depicts how the sugar trade expanded from the Muslim world to the canary islands nearby Africa through the Europeans and later to America.
Hence, the details in the passage support the central idea by describing how the Spanish and Portuguese explorations helped expand the sugar trade.
The government limited the freedom of the Garcia family and left them scared and insecure.
<h3>Why did the government promote these effects?</h3>
- Because this was a dictatorial government.
- Because the government was authoritarian.
- Because the Garcia family was influential and against the dictatorship.
The Garcia family did not support the authoritarianism of the dictatorial government in their region, for this reason, they were investigated, spied on, and frightened by the government and its henchmen. This proved a strong fear, as all family members felt insecure and afraid of being attacked.
Learn more about dictatorship at the link:
brainly.com/question/2604816
#SPJ1
Answer:
<u>Epiphany </u>is a sudden revelation in a short story.
Irony is used in literature to lay emphasis on the story or a particular thing. It also involves the readers or audience to process the story on their own.
Situational irony is when what is happening in a particular scene is different from what is true or what the intended outcome is.
Explanation:
The term that is used to describe a sudden revelation in a short story is an epiphany. <u>Epiphany is a sudden realization of or about something, that comes as a 'bolt' of understanding</u>. It suddenly expresses or reveals the true nature of the character(s) through a particular word, or action or setting, etc.
Irony is the expression of a particular feeling or emotion but which signifies a completely different thing. This rhetorical device is used to express or show a feeling whose real meaning is the contrary of what was expressed. In literature, irony is used in such a way that it reveals the truth of a character or setting or scene which cannot be directly addressed or spoken by the characters. It also sometimes lays emphasis and provide a humorous tone to the story.
Situational irony is one such type of irony where the actions of the characters differ from what is happening. The outcome of the situation is the exact opposite of what was intended.
This seems to be a declarative sentence. It talks about the reaction of the policeman to a specific thing. His expression is not pleasant. What he might saw is something not good and something to worry about. Other possible thing could be there an heinous crime scene that he faced at that moment. It depends on the situation.<span />
The answer is to Cite the source
