Using multiplication signal rules, it is found that:
A: Emma's statement is always false.
B: The result is always negative.
C: Emma's statement is always true.
The rule used for this exercise is as follows:
- When two numbers of different signals are multiplied, the result is negative.
- When two numbers have the same signal, the result is positive.
Part A:
- Three numbers are multiplied, all negative.
- The multiplication of the first two result in a positive number.
- Then, this positive number is multiplied by a negative number, and the result will be negative, which mean that Emma's statement is always false.
Two examples are:


Part B:
The rule is that the result is always negative.
Part C:
- The multiplication of the first two negative numbers result in a positive number.
- Then, this positive number is multiplied by another positive number, and the result will be positive, which mean that Emma's statement is always true.
Two examples are:


A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/24764960
Answer:
350
Step-by-step explanation:
12% = 0.12
42 / 0.12 = 350
Answer:
x=3
Step-by-step explanation:
Use pemdas!
First use distributive property to get rid of the parenthesis, by multiplying 2 by 3x and -4. Then combine like terms and use inverse operations to simplify each side until you get it down to just x! Hope this helped! :)
Answer:
One number is 17 and the other is 85.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the numbers be m and n. Let m = (1/5)n. Note that m+n = 18.
Substituting (1/5)n for m in the 2nd equation, we get (1/5)n + (5/5)n = 18. Multiplying all three terms by 5 to remove fractions, we get n + 5 = 90, so that n = 85. m is (1/5) of 85, or m = 17.