1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ilya [14]
3 years ago
11

The results of the schachter and singer (1962) experiment in which participants were injected with adrenaline prior to spending

time with either a hostile or a euphoric person support the idea that
Social Studies
1 answer:
malfutka [58]3 years ago
3 0
<span>The goal of the Schacter and Singer experiment in 1962 was to test how people use clues in their environment to explain physiological arousal.</span>
The results of the  experiment in, in which participants were injected with adrenaline prior to spending time with either a hostile or a euphoric person support the idea that bodily arousal feeds one emotion or another depending on how we interpret the arousal. 
You might be interested in
Abraham Lincoln fought to preseve this?
AlekseyPX
Abraham Lincoln wanted to preserve the Union and unify the United States again(Civil War).
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what did mandela meant A man who takes away another man's freedom is a prisoner of hatred, he is locked behind the bars of preju
horrorfan [7]

Mandela means that someone who decides to take someone else's freedom is prjudiced and narrowminded. He can not be free if he takes away someone else's freedom just as a person who does not have freedom.

A person who takes away someone else's freedom is not free.

8 0
3 years ago
What are the pros and cons about the 11th amendment
kozerog [31]

Answer:

The pro of the 11th amendment are that states cannot be sued by a citizen who does not live in that state in federal court. The con is that states gain some immunity and you cannot petition them for lost property or funds.

Explanation:

The Pros of the 11th amendment:

The 11th Amendment to the US Constitution is a complicated but short amendment that has various implications. Basically it says that the federal courts of the United States cannot hear cases where a citizen who lives in another state or the citizen of another country is petitioning to sue that state. This gives individual states their sovereignty so they can act without bringing upon themselves a lawsuit. It is also good in terms of our state taxes and the costs to administrate the state. It seems that before the 11th Amendment of the US Constitution was ratified, most of the cases that were brought against a state in this way were suing the state for money they had failed to pay back or the return of property. This is the case with a British citizen named William Vassall who apparently sued the state of Massachusetts for the land they confiscated from him during the Revolutionary War. This would become an expensive process for each state if it were still possible.

The Cons of the 11th amendment:

The 11th Amendment has negative implications too in the sense that you can be wronged by a state and you will never be able to redress it by appealing to federal courts. It gives states a level of immunity if they are confiscating property from people who live out of state or who come from another country. It seems to put the rights of the state above the rights of a citizen or foreign citizen in this regard.    

7 0
2 years ago
Look at the cover of the toothpaste and list down the ingredients present in it?​
puteri [66]

Answer:

Toothpastes generally contain the following components: Water (20–40%) Abrasives (50%) including aluminum hydroxide, calcium hydrogen phosphates, calcium carbonate, silica and hydroxyapatite. Fluoride (usually 1450 ppm) mainly in the form of sodium fluoride.

8 0
2 years ago
8. How did World War I change the Middle East? How can this influence be seen on the contemporary political map?​
Contact [7]

Answer:

The misfortunes in the Middle East were faltering: the war not just attacked the land and pulverized armed forces, it decimated entire social orders and economies. Thusly, the experience of World War I in the Middle East is maybe more likened to the experience of World War II in Europe.Nov 16, 2015

Explanation:

The misfortunes in the Middle East were faltering: the war not just attacked the land and pulverized armed forces, it decimated entire social orders and economies. Thusly, the experience of World War I in the Middle East is maybe more likened to the experience of World War II in Europe.Nov 16, 2015

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which article of the U.S. Constitution would MOST likely deal with the issue of trying cases involving treason?
    6·2 answers
  • The statement, "By keeping women in traditional gender roles, men maintain control over institutions and resources," most closel
    15·1 answer
  • Any two social norms​
    13·2 answers
  • What is an enemy combatant? A. a person who has information on the enemy that he or she will reveal for combat pay. B. a person
    15·2 answers
  • Explain with examples the Social, Legal, and political functions of local government units in a State
    5·1 answer
  • Why is it easier for a dictatorship to go to war versus a democratic country
    11·1 answer
  • Reggie is getting his first paycheck. He does not understand the difference between gross and net pay. In paragraph form explain
    13·1 answer
  • Any lgbt people out there? I just joined I need friends ️‍️‍️‍️‍⚧️️‍⚧️️‍⚧️
    8·2 answers
  • You have allowed the wheels of your vehicle to run off the edge of the pavement. you should
    10·1 answer
  • Write any cause that the gorkhas wanted to get victory over nuwakot<br>​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!