I do not understand the question.
The prioress is a nun who is head of a house of nuns. At the beginning of the tale, Chaucer describes her physical appearance such as her mouth, her eyes and her face. Then, he moves on to describe what she has: her clothes and her jewellery. The coral trinket on her arm is the first piece of jewellery Chaucer mentions. The reader expects a nun not to wear any jewellery of decorative nature because she is devoted to God and does not have to worry about her looks or about materialistic things such as jewellery. The "coral trinket" is the first hint the author gives the reader that shows the prioress is not the typical nun one would expect.
Answer:
D) He identified a woman as a witch in his own church, and she was shown to be not guilty.
Explanation:
<u>It is said that Reverend John Hale has identified a woman to be a witch year before in his parish in Beverly</u>. The woman in question turned out to be not guilty, but “a mere pest”. Still, Reverent Hale thinks of himself as qualified to detect satanic doings and witchcraft, and others think of him in this manner as well.
<u> Even though Reverend Parris of Salem knows the woman of Beverly did not turn out to be a witch, he still called Reverend Hale to look into the matter.</u> He presents him as having experience in demonic arts, and Mrs. Putnam agrees.
Therefore, his false accusation still remains as his qualifier and we can see how people tend to believe church Reverends even when they wrong.
No, it doesn’t still make sense because you’re deleting letters so it won’t make words if that’s what ur asking
