The following are the correct answers:
- <span>disbelieving that cyberbullying causes serious harm
- </span><span>convincing others that cyberbullying is harmless
- </span><span>refusing to take responsibility to stop cyberbullying
- </span><span>using technology to participate in cyberbullying
Cyberbullying can be a serious problem if not treated on time; we should try and speak up and convince others that this is something that should be prevented so as to avoid many accidents that commonly occur as a result of any type of bullying, cyber included. </span>
<span>In April 1944, a couple of intruders break into the office. In the process, they break a plank to the door that leads to the secret hiding place where Anne lives such a precarious existence with her family. Mr. Van Daan makes the fatal mistake of shouting, "Police!" at the men in an effort to scare them away. But he forgets that this will simply draw attention to the existence of the secret annex.</span>
B.a sculptor himself .................................
Answer and Explanation:
Hello. You did not inform the article to which this question refers, which may leave the textual evidence a little inaccurate, but I will try to help you in the best possible way.
"Frankenstein" is still relevant for a number of factors. One of the main factors is the allegories and metaphors that the author used to show our human condition and complexity in relation to technology, family, knowledge, acceptance and loneliness.
The author is able to show, through Victor Frankenstein, how excited we are about scientific and technological advances, but how we are afraid of the changes that these advances provide, because these changes can turn against us and provide an ugly reality that we do not want to face, but even so we are not able to contain the curiosity in forming the new. In other words, the author exposes our ambiguity as human beings and how this promotes complex and often destructive relationships.
This is all highly current and manages to move our reasoning and vision of ourselves, which makes the book something visionary and current, even though it was written more than 200 years ago.