1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iVinArrow [24]
3 years ago
11

Who were some of the queens and/or princesses that reigned during the American colonies' time-period?

History
1 answer:
aivan3 [116]3 years ago
6 0

<u>Answer</u>:

Anne was one of the queen that reigned during the American colonies' time-period

<u>Explanation</u>:

Anne was one of the queens who wished to rule independently but had intellectual limitations due to bad health. She was motivated largely by Anglican church. She had lesser interest in Roman Catholics.  

She was known for her reign tactics. She also had the greatest of sympathies from High Church Tories. Political parties dominated mostly during the time, and she sought to free out of the clutches of the dominion of the political parties back then. William’s death was the main reason she succeeded him.

You might be interested in
QUESTION 29<br> Language lacks hierarchy.<br> O True<br> O False
abruzzese [7]

Answer:true

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
HELP!! 15 POINTS The Columbian Exchange is the name given to the widespread exchange of plants, animals, and communicable diseas
jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

Invasive species, including communicable diseases, were a byproduct of the exchange. The changes in agriculture significantly altered global populations. The most significant immediate impact of the Columbian exchange was the cultural exchanges and the transfer of people (both free and enslaved) between continents.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Products he/they invented from peanuts helped save agriculture in the south.
nataly862011 [7]
D) George Washington Carver
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Great Britain and France avoided a take over by fascist by
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Great Britain and France avoid a take over by fascists' by restricting freedom of speech.

Explanation:

Fascism is a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc. , and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.  

How Britain and France avoided fascist revolution inside their own country during rise of fascism in Italy and Germany?

What made Mussolini’s Fascism, and Lenin’s Communism too, was a specific and unique situation, never to be repeated in later history: namely, the presence of enormous masses of disaffected veterans, with recent experience of war at a very high technical level of skill, and angry about the condition of their country. (And of enormous amounts of weapons.) Fascism was not made by speeches or by money, but by tens of thousands of men gathering in armed bands to beat up enemies. And that being the case, what happened to the similar masses of veterans who came home to France, Britain, and America too, after 1918?

Well, France was exhausted. She had fought with her full strength from day one, whereas Britain had taken time to deploy its whole strength, and America and Italy had only entered the war much later. For five years, every man who could be spared had been at the Front. Her losses were larger in proportion than those of any other great power. And on the positive side, France, like Britain and America, was prosperous. The veterans went home to a country that was comparatively able to receive them, give them a place to be, and not foster any dangerous mass disaffection. This is of course relatively speaking. There will have been anger enough, irritation enough, even some disaffection. But the only real case of violence from below due to disaffection was the riot in Paris that followed the Stavisky affair in early 1934, and that, compared to what took place daily in other countries, was a very bad play of a riot.

ON the other hand, both America and Britain experienced situations that had more than a taste of Fascism, but that failed to develop into freedom-destroying movements. In America, Fascism could have come from above. The last few years of the Wilson administration were horrendous: the Red Scare fanaticized large strata of the population, and the hatred came from the top, from Wilson and his terrible AG Palmer. (Palmer was a Quaker. So was Richard Nixon. Is there a reason why Quakers in politics should prove particularly dangerous?) Hate and fear of “reds” was also the driving force of Italian Fascism; and Wilson and Palmer mobilized it in ways and with goals that Mussolini would have understood. Had Wilson not suffered his famous collapse, he might have been a real danger: he intended to run for a third term in office. And the nationwide spread of the new KKK, well beyond the bounds of the old South, shows that he might have found a pool of willing stormtroopers. Altogether, I think America dodged a bullet the size of a Gatling shot when Wilson collapsed in office.

Britain’s own Blackshirt moment took place in Ireland. Sociologically, culturally, psychologically, the Blacks and Tans were the Blackshirts of Britain - masses of disaffected veterans sent into the streets to harass and terrify political enemies, bullies in non-standard uniforms with a loose relationship with the authorities. Only, their relationship with public opinion developed in an exactly opposite direction. Whereas Italy’s majority, horrified by Socialist violence at home and by Communist brutality abroad, tended increasingly to excuse the Blackshirts and wink at their violence, in Britain - possibly because of the influence of the American media, which were largely against British rule in Ireland - the paramilitary force found itself increasingly isolated from the country’s mainstream, and eventually their evil reputation became an asset to their own enemies and contributed to British acceptance of Irish independence.

Thanks,
Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
Which proposal was most consistent with the goals of the american federation of labor under the leadership of samuel gompers? go
slava [35]
The correct answer is:collective bargaining to reach agreements on wages and hours
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • During what period of time did the conflict between pope and Gregory and the holy emperor Henry occur ?
    8·1 answer
  • In what way were noble ladies and peasant women alike?
    8·1 answer
  • Medical provides medical help for the poor
    6·2 answers
  • Why was embalming important to Egyptians?
    15·1 answer
  • What was an immediate result of the Black Death
    10·1 answer
  • Why dose anne franks story effect lives today
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the US fight in Iraq?
    12·1 answer
  • Taxes can affect ____ and economic growth by changing the ____, or motivation, to save, invest, and work.
    6·1 answer
  • Look at the map. Then read each sentence and choose the best answers from the drop-down menus.
    7·2 answers
  • The map below shows the percentage of the population in European countries that can functionally use the English language. Use t
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!