1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
saul85 [17]
2 years ago
11

Philip of Valois and Edward III both claimed right to the Spanish throne after the death of Philip IV's last son.

History
1 answer:
Savatey [412]2 years ago
5 0
The answer is false because  as this conflict revolved around the French throne and not the Spanish. EdwardÃ?s claim of inheriting it through his motherÃ?s bloodline was denied due to Salic Law and the throne was given to Charles, the Count of Valois.
You might be interested in
Which example shows the REFORM component of FDR’s New Deal?
agasfer [191]
I think its A, I might not be correct though. <span>the Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC)—to prevent another stock market crash by more government control/regulation in stock transactions.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify three acts of aggression by Germany in the 1930's
Mrrafil [7]

Answer:

Germany's militarization of the Rhineland, annexation of Austria, and aggression against Czechoslovakia, the Stalin-Hitler Pact of 1939, and the German attack on Poland. Like Italy and Japan, German aggression came from a need for resources, a desire to expand or gain back former land, and extreme nationalism.

8 0
2 years ago
The Dutch East India Company made quite a profit in the New World--for a while. However, it was never able to increase its earni
lukranit [14]

Answer:

The Dutch East India Company had many decision-makers leading it--the king of England had absolute power.

Tell me if wrong. :) Hope it helps!

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Was the US Supreme Court’s decision fair and benevolent to Dred Scott and his family? Why?
schepotkina [342]

Answer:

The US Supreme Court’s decision fair and benevolent to Dred Scott and his family is described below in complete detail.

Explanation:

The Dred Scott judgment was the U.S. Supreme Court's judgment on March 6, 1857, that has existed in a free state and region did not authorize a slave character, Dred Scott, to his independence.

They dictated that African Americans, whether they were slaves or had parents who were slaves, had no constitutional avenue in court. They believed that the Missouri Compromise was illegal. In the cores of the court, Dred Scott had no constitutional right to demand his freedom.

8 0
2 years ago
How did africa change islam
tester [92]
Well they are 2 different places so unless war happened describe what happened between them
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did many European nations fall to fascist dictators?
    11·1 answer
  • Why were many European immigrants attracted to the middle colonies
    7·1 answer
  • Please Help!!!
    13·1 answer
  • What lasting impact did the anti federalists demands give us
    10·1 answer
  • Need help one of three final exams!
    9·2 answers
  • What issues divided Republicans and Federalists during the Adam’s presidency?
    7·1 answer
  • Interest groups send representatives to state capitals and to Washington, D.C. to put pressure on members of Congress and other
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes a reason why England wanted to establish colonies in North America?
    5·2 answers
  • 10. Byzantine Emperor Justinian and Mesopotamian ruler Hammurabi were historically influential in which
    15·1 answer
  • Select all that apply.
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!