If you have an argument that is weak and uncogent, the conclusion may be either true or false.
An argument is a collection of two or more statements, one of which is supported by another. A conclusion is a proposition supported and a premise is a proposition supporting the conclusion. The purpose of an argument is to build a conclusion based on the premises or the evidence provided by the premises.
An inductive argument is one that claims that the conclusion follows with some degree of probability. In other words, premises make the conclusion more likely to be true, and premises true make the conclusion less likely to be false. Inductive arguments are powerful when given that the premises are true, the conclusion is unlikely to be false.
An inductive argument is weak when the conclusion is likely false given the premises are true. A strong argument is cogent if the premise is correct. A strong argument is uncogent if at least one of its premises is wrong.
Know more about uncogent argument here
brainly.com/question/13445406
#SPJ4
The Sugar Act was part of the policy of Mercantilism that favored England by controlling trade, especially in respect of the import of sugarcane from the West Indies.
By preventing colonists from trading with most foreign countries. How did mercantilist policies create tension between Great Britain and the colonies? Colonist organized boycotts of British goods. ... Colonists were forced to quarter troops in their homes.
Source Google Search
Answer:
it would be Antartica APEX
Explanation:
Answer:
B) The excitement of the accident and the speedy response of the rescuer would be considered in a case such as this.
Explanation:
D) is incorrect; the driver would have a defense if he could demonstrate that the rescuer's actions were reckless.
(A) is incorrect because, while the court can conclude that the rescuer recklessly put himself in danger, this is not an absolute defense.
(C) is an incorrect statement of law; assumption of risk may be applicable, depending on the circumstances, such as if the rescue were reckless.
Answer:
It is an example of scheduled obsolescence.
Explanation:
The new line of affordable cars does appeal to lower-income groups, however, they are not a safe long term investment.
In the industry it became common to sell low price products (that appeals to the masses) that also have low durability, thus forcing the buyer to purchase a newer model in a short amount of time.
This process takes advantage of the fact that the low-income part of the population doesn't have the means to make a long term investment on a higher quality product.
This process is called scheduled obsolescence, for its intentionally lack of durability.
