This would be a perfect example of whistle-blowing.
Whistle-blowing is an act of exposing the corrupt, illegal or even unethical practices, conducts and activities of the organization, either public or private, by an individual who is an employee of the the said organization. The person doing the act is called a whistleblower. They do this by either presenting the evidence to the higher ups or to the law enforcing agencies. The press is also an option.
According to Hamilton, the President with power and energy is not only important to good government but also critical to protecting the rights of the people because it gives President various power for the steady administration.
Also, Hamilton argued that President with such strong power and energy has the power of the laws, the protection of property, justice, to the security of liberty.
Alexander Hamilton, a former United States Secretary of Treasury, believed that President with power and energy is beneficial to the nation.
He also argued that a single executive is safer and can be vigilantly watched upon compared to multiple executives.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Alexander Hamilton favored President with power and energy.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/13701960
Since they viewed it as a great way to 'decrease the surplus population', having a different, more sympathetic outlook would have helped. Giving them food they could cook and eat would also have helped: the Irish had a lot of trouble trying to prepare and eat the Indian meal they sent. They could also have opened more soup kitchens, told the landlords to show a little leniency and stop evicting people because heir livelihoods were gone and their means of paying rent with them. But they wanted to get rid of the Irish, and so they did. There was a famine in the Scottish Highlands in 1846 and because of charitable efforts nowhere near as many people died. They could have saved them by showing charity, but they didn't.
