I think here Coach Capra's thinking is going to be inductive. I got this because inductive is "general laws from particular instances." Deductive is based more off law and rule. So it is the coach who thinks no one is better tan young Frank, but there could be. So my answer is A, inductive.
Answer:
Gretel's courage and the tale of the white bird is an example of parallel plot.
Explanation:
Gretel is always courageous enough to calm down and calm down Hansel, even though he knows they are in a difficult situation. As the birds ate the bread crumbs they put in the forest to get home, they were stuck in the forest and were hungry, but Gretel was brave enough to look for food and when they were almost giving up they heard a song of white birds, if it was a call to follow you. The bird song and Gretel's courage are an example of parallel plot.
Parallel Plot occurs when the writer mixes two plots at a single point. In this way the two plots walk around the same theme.
Answer: The answer is you can neither be fully supportive of the either. In fact the battle will go on or you may the arguments will perhaps get louder in the years to come.
Explanation: None of the nations wants to back from using a lucrative resources that they chance upon fully knowing the repercussions of climate change and various other damaging havoc that can impact the entire earth.
The greed in humans cannot be killed and perhaps we already are paying a heavy price for it. The conservationists believe the usage of the resources should be done in a responsible manner.
The supply need not be jeopardised for the future generations but no objections in continuing to use them though. Sustainability is the argument that they propound.
The preservationists are purists in the true sense they don't want to disturb mother nature and allow them to flourish in their pristine form and we continue to live in harmony with that.
The intrinsic value of the land and other resources have to retained and gained inspiration for its beauty and serenity. It is the theory that preservationists have stuck too for years.
Each is right in their own way, if we don't use the natural resources we won't be able to function as well as we do.
If we don't preserve some of the natural resources and stick our head into every resource on the surface of the earth, there will be large destruction and extinction of flora and fauna.
Hence it would be right to say, that we need to rethink what we are going to do because in the next few years what we do will determine our future and there is no going back then.
