Answer:
Without the ketchup is the relative clause.
You know that because if you take it out of the sentence, the sentence still makes sense.
Answer:
Alice learns she is having a dinner party with guests whom she did not invite.
Explanation:
<em>Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There </em>is a novel written by Lewis Carroll as the sequel to <em>Alice's Adventures in Wonderland</em>.
The detail that points to the theme that a person's path in life is already set is Alice learning that she is having a dinner party with guests whom she did not invite. We want to control all things that happen in our lives, but this detail shows us that sometimes it can't be like that. Some things are out of our control - they are already set and will happen no matter what our wishes are. That's why Alice has dinner with guests she didn't invite.
Papyrus is still used by communities living in the vicinity of swamps
Answer:
It is effective.
Explanation:
The claim is ineffective because it does not state a clear position.
It does state a clear position, (students should wear uniforms)
The claim is ineffective because it expresses a first person preference.
No mention of a first person preference in this statement.
The claim is ineffective because it suggests the essay will inform rather than argue.
It's rather clear the the person will argue for their claim, rather than inform the reader.
So by default, the answer must be that it is effective.
i'm pretty sure it's "had argued"
a participle is a verb used as an adjective
