1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gelneren [198K]
3 years ago
14

What system did the Federal Judiciary

History
1 answer:
dusya [7]3 years ago
4 0
One of the first acts of the new Congress was to establish a federal court system in the Judiciary Act of 1789. The Constitution provided that the judicial branch should be composed of one Supreme Court and such inferior courts as Congress from time to time established. But unlike the legislative provisions, in which the framers clearly spelled out the powers of the Congress, Article III of the Constitution is rather vague on just what the judicial powers should be.

Congress had little precedent to guide it, since in the British system the three court systems -- Common Pleas (private law), King's Bench (criminal law) and Chancery (equity) -- operated independently, and derived their authority from the King's writ. Even during colonial times, when American courts followed English precedent, the frontier society had been too poor in resources and trained personnel to follow British practice. So Congress had, in essence, a clean slate upon which to write. One of the more imaginative steps was combining law and equity into a single court system, thus providing for a more effective and efficient means of delivering justice.

The debate in Congress centered on how much power the Constitution transferred from the states to the federal government. States' rights activists opposed giving the new courts too much authority, while supporters argued that only a strong federal court system could overcome the weaknesses that had been so apparent during the Confederation period.

Looking back, it is hard to envision how the supremacy of the Constitution provided for in Article VI could possibly have been sustained without a strong federal court system, one empowered to review and, if necessary, overturn state court decisions. Otherwise, the country would have been saddled again with thirteen independent jurisdictions and no means to conform them to a single national standard. "I have never been able to see," James Madison wrote in 1832 commenting on the federal courts, how "the Constitution itself could have been the supreme law of the land; or that the uniformity of Federal authority throughout the parts to it could be preserved; or that without the uniformity, anarchy and disunion could be prevented."

The courts of the United States, as much as the legislative and executive branches, have been instruments of democratic government, binding a diverse people together.

For further reading: D.F. Henderson, Courts for a New Nation (1971); Julius Goebel, Antecedents and Beginnings to 1801 (1971); the first volume of the Holmes Devise, History of the Supreme Court of the United States; and Maeva Marcus, ed., Origins of the Federal Judiciary (1992).
You might be interested in
Cold War <br><br> Can domestic protest affect the outcome of war?
Aleks [24]

Answer:

Answer: People protested against the war by holding marches, demonstrations, teach-ins, and draft resisance and evasion. Soon these protests also turned phyical and violent against anyone who was aligned with the military.

7 0
3 years ago
Why did these regulations have little effect on big businesses
mariarad [96]

Answer: you need to be more in depth with ur questions

Explanation:

4 0
1 year ago
1.Which of the following events happened last?
s344n2d4d5 [400]
Clearly the establishment of the colonies comes first then next would be the Writs of Assistance, next the Intolerable Acts, Then finally the stamp act
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were greek men expected keep their bodies in shape?
REY [17]
Every Greek man was expected to keep in shape in case he was called up to the military. (War in Greece was almost constant.)
5 0
3 years ago
Write a two-paragraph discussion post that answers the following: “Was the Mexican-American War a just war? Why or why not?”
Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

The Mexican army attacked them. The main cause of the war was the westward expansion of the United States. All through the 19th century Americans believed it was their right to expand westward. At the time they believed they could conquer the people already living on the land and take it for the United States.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did thomas f. drayton deny that the confederacy was fighting to defend slavery?
    11·1 answer
  • What method of organization did jefferson use in creating the declaration of independence ?
    12·1 answer
  • What was considered one of the most important animals due to their value when used along the Trans Saharan Trade routes?
    10·1 answer
  • Describe the lifestyle of the Creeks prior to the early 18th Century.
    9·1 answer
  • To be unfair in judgment; to be prejudiced and show partiality is
    11·2 answers
  • Which form(s) of government does NOT allow for power to be inherited?
    5·2 answers
  • Will mark brainlest if right
    11·2 answers
  • To overcome opposition to ratifying the Constitution in Massachusetts, Federalists promised to support
    12·1 answer
  • Answer question above
    7·2 answers
  • I NEED HELP IM ON A QUIZ
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!