Answer:
Explanation: in what country ?
All of the above are correct. I'll explain:
Work became more dangerous in the 1800's. This was a result of the increase in industrialization, it caused machines to be more powerful, and easier to cause harm. Also, workers in the late 1800´s had a very low standard of living, consequence of their low wages. So this caused 4 things:
- Low skilled jobs often didn't result in better wages or better and safer working conditions, so they attempted to try to get into a skilled trade.
- They often demanded higher wages because jobs often came with very low wages for workers.
- Workers began to join forces to gain enough power to impose better wages and working conditions. They joined forces with other employees creating 'working unions'.
- Sometimes they just tried to find a better job when none of the other options were available, or didn't work at all.
I hope this helps understand why all of the options are correct. Working in the 1800's was a risky business!
Have a great week!
Geographic features that isolated Ancient China were the Himalayas, Takla Makan, and the Gobi Desert.
Explanation:
Ancient China was one of the most developed civilizations in the world, and in numerous periods it was far ahead than any other civilization. Unlike the other civilizations though, which were in constant contact with each other and exchanging knowledge and technology, China was not like that, which makes its development even more impressive.
China was actually isolated, both from the geographical features and because of its own policies. The geography played a very big role, and it was what helped the isolationist policy. The major geographic features that were isolating Ancient China were:
- Himalayan Mountain Range (the biggest and highest in the world)
- Takla Makan (very harsh, vast desert)
- Gobi Desert (massive, rocky, cold desert)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the options for this question,
However, trying to help you, we can answer based on our knowledge of this topic.
The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people "that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement."
We are talking about the Supreme Court case in which the Warren Court dealt with the rights of the accused: Miranda v. Arizona.
Miranda v. Arizona was a case decided by the Warren court on June 13, 1966. Ernesto Miranda had a written confession for kidnap and r*pe, but the issue was that police interrogated him without the presence of a lawyer, neither the police officers told him he had the right to call a lawyer.
The Court's decision favored Miranda, overturned his conviction and the case was sent to Arizona for retrial.
