The separating of recordkeeping from the custody of assets a limitation of an internal control system because:
- In example above, fraud could occur only if the two employees collude (agree to work together to commit fraud)
- Employee maintaining accounting records has no incentive to falsify records.
- Employee controlling asset will know if another person is maintaining records or not.
- The employee who controls/has access to an asset should not maintain that asset's accounting records.
<h3>
What is meant by Internal Control?</h3>
- Internal controls are the mechanisms, rules, and procedures implemented by a corporation to ensure the integrity of financial and accounting information, promote accountability, and stop fraud.
- Internal controls can help improve operational efficiency by improving the accuracy and timeliness of financial reporting, besides complying with laws and regulations and preventing employees from stealing assets or committing fraud.
To learn more about asset's accounting records: brainly.com/question/24012821
#SPJ4
Answer:
Internal
Explanation:
As the name implies, internal marketing is one in which a service firm trains employees in a product's company and its customers' contact to ensure maximum customer satisfaction. Internal marketing means that every member of staff is involved in marketing and not just the marketing department of the firm.
Cheers.
Answer:
C. Unearned revenue would be debited for $700.
E. Service revenue would be credited for $700.
Explanation:
As we recieve the payment in-advance we take the obligation to perform our duties with the customer.
Therefore it is unearned revenue (liability)
at year-end there is a portion which is still unearned by the amount of 300 dollars Hence, the difference was earned: 1,000 - 300 = 700
we will decrease our liability against the customer and recognize the revenue by crediting service revenue.
Answer:
$1,728
Explanation:
To reach maximum depreciation expense we simply first compute the depreciation which is shown below:-
Depreciation = Purchased computer × Depreciation Rate
= $30,000 × 11.52%
= $3,456
Refer to the MACRS Table 1
Maximum depreciation expense = Depreciation × Half year convention
= $3,456 × 50%
= $1,728
Here we considered half year convention of equipment.
Answer:
Yes Gordon can sue Floors n' Mores for the settlement of the contract keeping in mind that Gordon has made partial completion of the contract. Full payment would be determined based on the completion of the total work in line withe the plans submitted when the contract was signed
Explanation:
In order to understand the scenario in case if Gordon wants to sue Floors n Mores they can only be compensated for the amount of project completion in line to the expectations that matches to Floors n More.
For Example if 75% of the work is in line with the expectation of Floors N More then Gordon should be paid total amount payable multiply by 75%.
Usually in such cases if the contract is fulfilled to certain extent it is preferred to close the contract based on the %age of completion because major reconstruction, buying of fixtures and furniture was executed. Hence major risks and rewards were transferred to Floors n Mores.
