How much power should the president have? On one hand, a powerful executive permits quick and decisive action, which is important for responding to current events. On the other hand, if the president gets too powerful, Congress and the people may lack the ability to hold him or her accountable.
“The Executive Department Further Considered,” written by Alexander Hamilton. In this essay, Hamilton argues that a single executive (led by one person as president, rather than several people acting as a council) is the best form for the executive branch of the United States.
He reasons that one president can act more quickly, and with more secrecy when necessary, than a larger group of leaders. He also argues that a single executive is less dangerous to democracy than a council, because it is easier to identify and remove one corrupt person than to discover who among several leaders is a bad actor.
plz mark me as brainliest :)
No military action led to the start of WW1; the catalyst to WW1 was the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, the archduke of Austria-Hungary. His murder by Gavrilo Princip – a Serbian nationalist, caused Austria-Hungary to declare war on Serbia, which drew the other European countries into the war due to their existing treaties of mutual defense.
The major platform of the Republican Party in the 1850s was an antislavery platform. Antislavery leaders opposed the extension of slavery into even more territories. Their opposition of slavery ended up helping them to join forces.
Hope this helps! :)
Geta was one. another one is Caracalla.
Answer:
The purpose/goal of the Indian Removal Act was to gain more land for the " New Americans."
Explanation: The Caucasians murdered the Indians to steal the land that was in the Indians property. They wanted the gold that was discovered in the Indians land. With their greed they decided to kill the Indians, and so they gained the Indian's land.
