Answer:
The policies of President Richard Nixon were different from his predecessor such as Kennedy and Johnson because Nixon focused on Foreign policies.
Carter's foreign policies were different from Nixon.
Explanation:
President Richard Nixon was the 37th President of the United States. He succeeded Lyndon B. Johnson, the 36th President.
The policies of Nixon were very much different from those of his successors such as President Kennedy and Johnson as Nixon tried to focus more on Foreign Policies than Domestic ones. In his Presidency, US was able to come to the place of peace with USSR, China, etc. He was a member of Republican Party. He was the only President in US's history to have resign from the office for being involved in Watergate scandal.
The policies of Jimmy Carter were different from those of Nixon's policies. Jimmy Carter was the 39th President of the States. Carter began his office with promising policies which he was unable to fulfil. But he still managed to work on certain of his policies. His foreign policy was different from Nixon's foreign policy as he denied to agree with the wrong.
I believe the best answer for this would be D
Explanation: The Mandate of Heaven did not require a ruler to be of noble birth, and had no time limitations. Instead, rulers were expected to be good and just in order to keep the Mandate. The Zhou claimed that their rule was justified by the Mandate of Heaven. In other words, the Zhou believed that the Shang kings had become immoral with their excessive drinking, luxuriant living, and cruelty, and so had lost their mandate.
Answer:
1. The U.S. entered the first war that was not fought on their own ground, therefore they had to make ore supplies than they would usually make if they were fighting over here.
2. Directly after the war came the depression.
Explanation:
(Brainliest plz?)
Answer:
The absence of armed fight against the mother country (Spain and Portugal), and the result of each independence.
Explanation:
The main characteristic of the independence movements of the Spanish colonies is that in almost all there was a war between the colonists and colonizers that dragged on for some years and ended with the victory of the colonists. It was like that in Chile, Uruguay, Argentina, and Bolivia. In Brazil, <u><em>there were several conflicts during the Independence process, but none directly influenced the Declaration of Independence.</em></u>
The main difference between the Independence movements of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile is the result achieved by each country. In Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay, declarations of Independence took these countries directly to the republican regime, while <u><em>in Brazil there was only a political break with the metropolis maintaining the entire system that was in force during the colony.</em></u>
