I disagree with the statement: "Economic decisions are more likely to benefit consumers in a free enterprise economy than in a command economy" because the activity that goes on in the "market economy" in unplanned, and unorganized by any central authority but only certified by the "goods" that it involves, on the other hand, a "command economy" is organized by the government officials. China, North Korea, and Soviet Union are all examples of command economies.
The French would have viewed William Normandy, in general, in a far better light than those in England, since although Normandy had political differences from France is still located on the continent, whereas he launched a famous invasion of England.
Explanation:
William of Normandy<span>, </span>a lot of unremarkably called<span> William the </span>master<span>, was a king </span>WHO<span> won against the Anglo-Saxons at the Battle of Hastings in 1066 AD and </span>so<span> conquered </span>British people<span> isles. Whereas the French saw him as </span>an excellent<span> and noble </span>master<span>, the remaining Anglo-Saxon population in </span>England may need<span> to see him as </span>a far-off<span> tyrant </span>who<span> ravaged their country. </span>
True? I do not understand what you are asking
The Spanish monarchs that pushed the Moors out of Spain by C. Ferdinand and Isabella. They were known as the "Catholic monarchs" and their marriage formed the Kingdom of Spain.