<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
<u>Setting a Goal = B
</u>
Basis the past data and knowledge, 90 seconds is set as target for maximum time to hold
.
<u>Developing a Action Plan = A
</u>
The contingent call center workers are hired for anytime service and support to ensure hold time is less than 90 seconds
.
<u>Reviewing progress = C
</u>
In mid of the project, review is done to check how many times hold time exceeded 90 seconds
.
<u>Appraising performance = D
</u>
It is done at the end post project completion with data and results
.
Vasily pushes for an acquisition anyway. The reason for this acquisition is principal agent problem.
A conflict of interests between a person or group and the agent appointed to act on their behalf is known as the principal-agent dilemma. It is possible for an agent to do actions that are not in the principal's best interests.
The principal-agent problem is as complex as the range of principal and agent responsibilities. It can happen in any circumstance where the primary or owner of an asset transfers direct control of the asset to a third party or agent.
Agency costs are the possibility that the agent will take actions that are not in the principal's best interests. In order to align priorities and solve a principal-agent problem, the rewards system may need to be changed.
To know more about principal agent:
brainly.com/question/15847415
#SPJ4
Answer:
b)
Annual Depreciation expense= $58,800
Explanation:
<em>According to International Accounting standards(IAS) 16 property plan and equipment (PPE), the cost of an asset is the purchase cost plus other costs of bringing it to the intended working conditions.</em>
So we will add the purchase cost to installation , freight charges.
Cost of assets = 300,000 + 14,000 + 40,000 =$354,000
Annual depreciation = (Cost - Scrap Value)/ Number of years
= (354,000 - 60,000)/5
=$58,800
Annual Depreciation expense= $58,800
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the direct labor efficiency variance is shown below;
= Standard Rate × (Standard Hours - Actual Hours)
= $22.50 × (4,760 Units × 2 hours per unit - 8,900)
= $13,950 Favourable
Hence, the direct labor efficiency variance is $13,950 favorable
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct amount could come
Answer:
d. $1050.
Explanation:
We multiply each account balance by the expected uncollectible amount and then addd them to get the expected total for doutful accounts
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}Date&Amount&Expected&uncollectible\\$not due&10000&0.02&200\\$up to 30&5000&0.05&250\\$up to 60&3000&0.1&300\\$more than 61&800&0.5&400\\&&Total&1150\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7DDate%26Amount%26Expected%26uncollectible%5C%5C%24not%20due%2610000%260.02%26200%5C%5C%24up%20to%2030%265000%260.05%26250%5C%5C%24up%20to%2060%263000%260.1%26300%5C%5C%24more%20than%2061%26800%260.5%26400%5C%5C%26%26Total%261150%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Balance of the allowance account: 100
The expense will be the adjustment made on the allowance to get the expected balance of 1,150
1,150 - 100 = 1,050
we increase the allowance bu 1,050 to get our expected uncollectible fro maccounts receivable agaisnt the bad debt expense ofthe period.
