Answer:
The partial-reinforcement extinction effect
Explanation:
The partial-reinforcement extinction effect is an effect in which if a person is under partial reinforcement it will increase the capacity of learning but a person is under full reinforcement it does not happen.
The advantage of partial reinforcement has been documented under laboratory tests in the lab experiment. Infield it is not supported. This reinforcement was analyzed on human beings by using two discrete trials. The partial reinforcement has greater resistance to extinction than the full-time reinforcement.
The correct answer is A) true.
It is true that Moral Law theorists regard ethical value-statements as statements about moral character, not as statements about some alleged moral law.
Theorists and scholars affirm that ethics is the study of the moral act of humans. Moral has to do with the duality of good and bad in life. So moral character is the foundation of Ethics. There are no laws that appeal or enforce morals, which is part of the inner decision of humans on how to act.
The best statement to fill in the blank is standard of living. Real GDP per capita is the most popular way to measure standard of living. The real GDP is an important indicator for the economic status of an area. It will dictate the quality of life of the people in that area.
Answer:
The United States believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which posed a great threat at the hands of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein. It also believed that terrorists were supported and even harbored by the country. So, to remove the dictator from power and to get rid of any weapons and eliminate or drive out terrorists were the main objectives behind the attack on Iraq.
Explanation:
The rationale behind the motive to invade and attack Iraq was to primarily <u>end the regime of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein</u>. Other purposes were to <u>end the harboring of terrorists in the land</u> and <u>eliminate any weapons of mass destruction that Iraq was believed to be in possession of</u>.
The attack on Iraq by the United States in 2003 was based on US's beliefs that the Arab nation has disobeyed the demands of the United Nations and had harbored and supported terrorists. Moreover, the need to eliminate the dictator Saddam Hussein and establish a democratic government and provide peace to the Iraq people also became the main objective behind the invasion. The US also believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which can act as a huge threat to the overall safety of everyone around the world. So, the need to identify, isolate and destroy such weapons before they are actually put into use also led to the attack. US military continued to stay in Iraq till 2011 after which all troops were withdrawn.
